DNP Posted April 7, 2012 Report Share Posted April 7, 2012 Mine is #57 and I have yet to have a problem with either of my pmags <thumbsup> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFail Posted April 7, 2012 Report Share Posted April 7, 2012 Mine is #57 and I have yet to have a problem with either of my pmags <thumbsup>Seems JD may have/had a consistency problem. I hope it is in the past tense, as in "had". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imschur Posted April 7, 2012 Report Share Posted April 7, 2012 Keep in mind as mentioned previously the MAGPULS were not available when the JD hardware was released. We saw this with CMMG as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaDuce Posted April 7, 2012 Report Share Posted April 7, 2012 I know where you're coming from and how you feel Mr. Robobot. You research everything you can think of only to get screwed on the one thing you missed. Happens allot in my life. Well, I wouldn't toss that receiver right yet. You can always use it in your gun now and replace it later. Once you replace it, you'll have some trade stock. All is not lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robocop1051 Posted April 7, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2012 I sold that receiver YEARS ago. I went with the SI-Defense instead. I saw JDM at the local gun show (Sacramento) and I really liked their new stuff. They are definitely getting expensive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DNP Posted April 8, 2012 Report Share Posted April 8, 2012 Seems JD may have/had a consistency problem. I hope it is in the past tense, as in "had".I hope it was a "had" as well. I had my fair share of issues with their tolerances being a bit tight. Overall, I'm pretty happy with the gun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFail Posted April 8, 2012 Report Share Posted April 8, 2012 I hope it was a "had" as well. I had my fair share of issues with their tolerances being a bit tight. Overall, I'm pretty happy with the gun.Yeah, well, at least they are photogenic <lmao> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalifornia Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 New here and maybe lucky , but my pmags work 100% with my JD 308 reciever set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoFail Posted May 24, 2012 Report Share Posted May 24, 2012 New here and maybe lucky , but my pmags work 100% with my JD 308 reciever set.Yes I concur. I have not had any load failures at all with Pmags, nor any type of failure for that matter. I must say that now that I have completed mine I have nothing bad to say about my JDM receivers. I am very satisfied with the final product now at this time <thumbsup> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.