shooterrex Posted January 20 Report Share Posted January 20 The extension has O rings that grip the inside of the BCG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianK Posted January 20 Report Share Posted January 20 I'm not going to check it now, but if I remember correctly the hinge part also has a retention detent that protrudes when the hinge is swung open preventing the BCG extension from coming out. It's fairly bulletproof. Just don't push the actuator button when it's swung open 'cause that's how the extension comes out for disassembly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sketch Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 (edited) On 1/19/2023 at 7:34 AM, JMJ said: I like the way you think! So what’s the consensus here on the Law Tactical folding adapter?I’ve thought about it for this pistol lower, but I don’t get warm fuzzy feelings about the spacer that slips into the rear of the BCG. Definitely a chunk of change for something that I haven’t been able to check out in person around here. To address the actual as I re read, you have to give a significant pull to remove the plunger. I've had zero problems with this kit on a hike in a backpack. Edited January 21 by sketch Commas mean shits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted January 24 Report Share Posted January 24 On 1/21/2023 at 12:05 AM, sketch said: To address the actual as I re read, you have to give a significant pull to remove the plunger. I've had zero problems with this kit on a hike in a backpack. Thanks for that info @sketch! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianK Posted January 25 Report Share Posted January 25 Whoops! Disregard what I wrote above. I have the Sylvan Arms folder and not the Law Tac'. Mind fart on full display. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sketch Posted January 25 Report Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, BrianK said: Whoops! Disregard what I wrote above. I have the Sylvan Arms folder and not the Law Tac'. Mind fart on full display. I have a sylvan arms also (possibly 2) and it is not worth the money. The aluminum is weak, and does not keep the lock stalk from folding under sling tension. Tested for 6 months. Or less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianK Posted January 25 Report Share Posted January 25 Good to know. I'll start looking for a replacement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtallen83 Posted January 26 Report Share Posted January 26 On 1/25/2023 at 12:09 AM, sketch said: not worth the money. Thank you for the info Brother, that explains the sale prices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted January 26 Report Share Posted January 26 On 1/25/2023 at 12:09 AM, sketch said: I have a sylvan arms also (possibly 2) and it is not worth the money. The aluminum is weak, and does not keep the lock stalk from folding under sling tension. Tested for 6 months. Or less. Also good to know, I came really close to picking one of those up last summer. Only thing that held me back at the time was that I didn’t like how the main portion of the Sylvan didn’t butt up against the receiver like the Law unit does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.