Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

Chinese Biological Espionage


Cunuckgaucho
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Cunuckgaucho said:

cough cough... post #16...

When it is published in the Scientist, for other scientists to read, it is a big thing. 1. Beyond a shadow of a doubt it happened, being referenced in multiple publications. 2. Not every thing can be verified like that in this day. I am a sceptic unless there are multiple verifications of something from multiple sources. Groups and people from all sides try to influence us now by publishing false, partially true, or unverified speculative accounts, on both the left and on the right. I refuse to buy into that unless I can ascertain the information is indeed true. I will not take a stance on something unless it’s accuracy can be verified. I can’t afford to believe lies, no matter how much I may want to.

https://theconversation.com/humans-are-hardwired-to-dismiss-facts-that-dont-fit-their-worldview-127168?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=bylinefacebookbutton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just thought I’d throw this out there. Don’t miss the interview imbedded in the text about half way through the text. It’s about 30 min long and it’s about the theory that the virus is man made. I believe it is.

https://greatgameindia.com/dr-francis-boyle-creator-of-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-is-biological-warfare-weapon/?fbclid=IwAR3JeAZh0s2GrelGA8pLlNhMZgIEqnJWg5ZTu3PA7tBsjQexFxJhmNYG_1U

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More likely the category 4 Wuhan biosciences lab let it escape through poor procedures. And once it got out, you can’t put the genie back in the bottle. There have been warnings of the potential for this to happen for the last 50 years. And 2 %  observed mortality is much higher then influenza and is actually pretty high. Influenza A is .01% I researched that when I got it 3 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sisco said:

Influenza A is .01%

Maybe an average over the years but many strains have been higher. That is also based on getting it in china, I would hope we have a little better record.

I just ain't buying into the scare, what scares me is what goofy Liberty infringing laws they are going to enact as a response while everyone is begging to be kept safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jtallen83 said:

Being this is such a low death rate compared to even the regular flu I would guess it is a test run to see what happens with a more serious virus to follow once they know the score.......question is who is they?

Chinese researchers have been quoted as the death rate may be as high as 18% in Wuhan. Plus death isn’t necessarily the goal, incapacitation and the strain on society is more important to a military strategist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not buying it, too little hard evidence and too much fear mongering. SARS, MERS, H1N1, Ebola, and on and on it goes. Diseases are part of life, always has been and always will be, Darwin will do what he does, just don’t wanna see any new laws granting government more power to deal with it, they have such a great record with healthcare issues ( pure sarcasm for those that don’t know me).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sisco said:

Chinese researchers have been quoted as the death rate may be as high as 18% in Wuhan. Plus death isn’t necessarily the goal, incapacitation and the strain on society is more important to a military strategist.

Very, very valid point. 

 

8 minutes ago, jtallen83 said:

SARS, MERS, H1N1, Ebola,

Ebola is a WAY different animal than those other respiratory issues listed.  Ebola liquefies your insides.  SARS, MERS, Bird Flu - have nothing on Ebola. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sisco said:

Chinese researchers have been quoted as the death rate may be as high as 18% in Wuhan. Plus death isn’t necessarily the goal, incapacitation and the strain on society is more important to a military strategist.

Same as wounding a soldier. Tying up resourses. Back to civilian's being the target in Bio war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...