I am glad that Snow N Surf posted this, I would like to comment on this as well.
It appears that different industries or professions view information about particular topics as guarded or secret . Not just with springs, but a lot of stuff across a vast range of items. It boggles my mind that a spring for a particular application is purchased (or used) based on it's over all length. Maybe that is supposed to make things easier, but it confuses things fairly quickly in my opinion.
I feel that it would be so much more beneficial to the firearm community as a whole, when talking about coil springs, a standard be used to describe springs more accurately. This thread is a perfect example that it touches on the issue, but doesn't take the mystery out of the equations.
Wire diameter, number of active coils, coil diameter, installed length, spring rate, and cycle life are all valid parameters that could be stated when describing a spring for a specific use, in this case a buffer spring.
I am not trying to be critical, it just seems that finding reliable information is necessary to grow the build community in a positive way.
Steve