Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

quality of dpms vs some of the others


Recommended Posts

i have been reading alot about the feeding issues with dpms, but it seems to be crappy factory mags.  i have a rock river car, and have never had a problem of any kind.  so the question is, is the RRA lar-8 worh $500 more than a dpms build.  or would getting say si defense upper and lower maintain reliability. 

is there a quality comparison anywhere, or is it personal preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DPMS had a bad batch of mags a while back. The internet being what it is this stuff sticks around and runs rampant. Im not 100% sure but I dont think you can use any upper other then RRA on your rifle either way.

Folks tend to hit the net vocalize a problem with anything.

With no milspec standard there will always be issues mixing and matching parts

Armalite seems to have the least complaints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say about 95 % of feeding issues are the mag. in any AR type rifle . Extraction & ejection is another matter , with any AR type rifle.

The DPMS receivered 308 I built is 100% reliable with any mag. & a good portion of it is DPMS parts (BCG,upper/ lower receiver & there parts groups )

If the action is not working , theres some thing wrong & needs to be tweaked ,so to speak.

I have two gripes with DPMS , they changed there upper receiver rail height & they have chamber issues (mass produced rifle , shows some quality control issues ), but all can be changed or cleaned up to make the rifle shoot & when they do they usually shoot very well .

SI defence are nice receivers . I have a CMMG lower with a SI Defence upper & its very nice ,but doesn't like the new Pmags for some reason .

Bolt over & FTF with them, but likes DPMS & CProducts mags & runs with them 100 %. This is some thing I am looking into when I get a chance.

If you are building , ya really can't go wrong with any of your choices ,as long as its put together right .

I'm not familiar with RRA rifles . Others will have to comment on them .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you are taking about a build on the DPMS platform. Your problems are going to be none to many the question what other parts are going to go on the DPMS lower. That is going to determine what problems you have. If you go with cheap parts then yeah expect some quicker than normal wear. If you go with the great parts that are out there then dont expect any problems. Thats not to say there will not be a little fine tuning on the rifle when you have it finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I see there is the DPMS upper .

They changed the rail height (lowered it ) & there are very little choices in hand guards to match the new rail height on the upper receiver .

Fulton Armory sells there DPMS uppers to the old std. rail height , but you might want to contact them to be sure . Last I knew , they did .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you have a suggestion for a replacement? how do you tell if it's the old vs new.

As said ,  Fulton Armory ,I think still sells the old height( & I believe they are made by DPMS ) , call or email to make sure they haven't changed any thing .

Here is how to measure the upper to find out .

Info straight from DPMS:

Our AR15 receivers are all the same height except the High Rider and Tri-Mount.

The LR308 Platform has two heights, the A3 and Lo-Pro Raised Rail. The A3 was changed recently to better accommodate our other components. I guess in reality, with the number sold before the change, there are now 3 heights.

To find out if you have a newer model or older run, the easiest way to measure is with a caliper from the bottom surface that mates to the lower to the top of the rail. The new versions measure 2.003 and the old versions are 2.063.

Any larger receiver rail to handguard rail height difference would be due to the lack of an industry standard in the large frame AR style rifles. Everybody is still pretty much making their own thing and some measurements just don't line up between manufacturers.

And the above is from a manufacturer that just changed there's from std .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...