Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About survivalshop

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    North Florida

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Wasn't sure if this was the place to put this , but its pretty amazing . Trรจs belles chaussures1.mp4
  2. It's not if , because they can determine anything law makers can come up with as unconstitutional & that will make it null & void . They do something like it every year . It is wishful thinking that they do so , but they have the power & final say , it's their job . They are not adding anything , to anything or making/changing a law , just making a judgement call on its constitutionality .
  3. What if they make a decision its unconstitutional ?
  4. I should have explained it better , I was referring to the area , as if the Carrier Key is forcing the CH up against it & yes I know the CH is between the Key & Upper Receiver .
  5. If this is a Armalite factory built Rifle , I would contact them & see if they will look at it under warranty . What I see is , from what I have read , the AR 10 Rifle Buffer Spring has 35 coils & yours seems to have 45 coils , if my counting is correct & Spring seems short according to the spec's I have read . Split cases are not unusual with some of the wildcat cartridges , older ammo may be an issue also .Normally when you are splitting case necks on new ammo , there is a Chamber or ammo issue . Have to start at the basic's , Head Space , Chamber clean & clear of Reamer marks , Barrels gas port size ( drill Bits work well as gages ) It may be the photo , but it looks like there is a good bit of wear on the Upper Receiver where the Carrier Key is riding at the top of the Upper Receivers Channel ?
  6. Ya, it's amazing how the public never hears the facts & if we do we only get what they want us to hear . It's like pulling teeth to get updates. Nor do we know if the Suppressor truly was used . I found that quote about not a" Bearable Arm" to be a bit troubling , but until SCOTUS really gets to a decision on " Shall not be Infringed " we will get lower courts making dumb a$$ statements .
  7. I'm not sure who to feel sorry for !
  8. Read this & also these two quotes are interesting . https://www.news4jax.com/news/politics/supreme-court-rejects-challenges-to-silencer-laws " An appeals court had held that a silencer is not a "bearable" arm protected by the Constitution. " ( Bump Stocks would also fall under this ) " The Trump administration had also urged the court not to take up the issue."
  9. No , take me , I may be old , but will change targets on the stands & like to clean firearms ๐Ÿ˜ณ. I'm taking bets it never makes it to Christmas before he gets it .
  10. Since you are using the same Bolt with two different Barrels , I would be looking at the Extractor & Spring first . You usually won't have a timing issue with a Rifle length ( or more ) Gas system , but an over Gassed system could give issues ( too large of Barrel Gas Port ? ) . Did both Barrels Head Space OK ? Photo's of spent Brass & Bolt components & Buffer system would be nice , including Buffer spring length & Coil count .
  11. Gee , another Barrel that has a Gas Port too small , that's new ๐Ÿ™„ I have had LR PMags since the first one came out & I don't remember a Gen. two , I thought they went right from the first original LR PMag ,right to the Gen 3 . I have so many of them , how do you know it's a Gen. two ? This is also the first I have heard of a Mag issue with the Small Framed 308 AR's . I had plenty of issues with one build with mixed manufactures Upper & Lower Receivers , but it wasn't a lock back issue , it was Tolerance stacking issue ( intermittent FTF ) , rifle also worked with all other Steel Mags & L7 Lancers, but would not work the the Org. LR PMag . The Gen. 3 LR PMag. when it came out ,worked fine in this particular build ( its why you should always use same Manufacturer for Receivers ) , so something did change in the two Gen. LR PMags .. If thats all it takes is to alter the Follower to make it work in your particular SF 308AR , thats an easy fix , but it's probably not the PMag , it is the tolerances of the Rifle, IMO.
  12. Looks like it has a full 11 deg. Crown on it already or did you add it ?
  13. Not sure if this has been brought up here , but its the first test I have seen on it . interesting it is for sure .
  14. You must think I'm new here .๐Ÿ˜Ž
  15. It looks different & has a weight in the BC Body & has a special coating to limit friction . Also notice, one staked Screw for attachment, maybe its dovetailed in or something also . Who's first to buy & test one of these ? https://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/bolt-parts/bolt-carrier-groups/m16-optimized-bolt-carrier-group-mpi-black-sku152000263-128171-230452.aspx?trk_msg=SAPET29O4IK497O7BC2PAULFB4&trk_contact=2JJJVUF1UDMRTL1H7DD8FULMM0&trk_module=bna&trk_sid=AJSKRHH1FEU30LK6IOQF7R2A4O&utm_source=listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=CHECK+IT+OUT&utm_campaign=Browse-Abandonment&utm_content=Product-Browse-Message-1
  • Create New...