Fort Tom Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 Excellent article. Makes point clearly, without all of the legal jargon. Thanks.
Cali_Ed Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 Might just sell my 556 and just use my sweet sweet 308. Either buy a bolt action or just bunch of powder and projos
slugger43 Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 ^^^ All the time, man. Oh hell, yeah! That's one cool pic. Gotta send that to the two Turd Senators from Washington State who hate guns.
planeflyer21 Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 This article is from The Federalist. Best piece I've seen yet on all the M855 crap. It's a long-ish read, but very well worth the time: The Obama Administration’s M855 Ammo Ban Is Blatantly Lawless Great article, very thorough. With the author's reference to "the people who wrote the law knew how ammunition is manufactured", intentionally choosing a careful wording, I would make the same claim about the "lack of a third decimal place" denoting .22 ammunition. In manufacturing, when a blueprint calls out a tolerance for a non-critical dimension, a lack of a third decimal place denotes a plus/minus tolerance of 0.015". Using the author's same reasoning about the lawmakers' ammunition knowledge, surely enough lawmakers in 1986 had metal shop when they were in highschool.
Sisco Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 (edited) I don't particularly like M855 and was thinking of selling my inventory at a premium right after replacing it with M193. Not ripoff pricing, mind you, but make enough to help fund another purchase. I bought it back in the day of 27 cents a round, PMC X Tac, and 32 cents a round Lake City. Think I will sit tight for a while. Edited March 11, 2015 by Sisco
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now