AdamO Posted November 25, 2014 Report Share Posted November 25, 2014 (edited) I used the AP receiver set with a plain ole no frills DPMS branded .308 buffer tube and buffer assy that I picked up from Brownells. No heavy buffer, no special springs, etc.etc.etc... Guess what, it does the job it's intended to do and the gun runs beautifully w/ mid length gas. I did use a syrac adj. gas block with it and dialed in the recoil is very livable with zero cycling issues in either 7.62 NATO or .308. Brass spits out right at 3 o'clock. Edited November 25, 2014 by AdamO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher67 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 (edited) I used the AP receiver set with a plain ole no frills DPMS branded .308 buffer tube and buffer assy that I picked up from Brownells. No heavy buffer, no special springs, etc.etc.etc... Guess what, it does the job it's intended to do and the gun runs beautifully w/ mid length gas. I did use a syrac adj. gas block with it and dialed in the recoil is very livable with zero cycling issues in either 7.62 NATO or .308. Brass spits out right at 3 o'clock. Very nice thanks Adam, something for me to ponder to. <thumbsup> Edited November 26, 2014 by Christopher67 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StainTrain Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Even with this buffer/tube/spring i have listed here? It should. If not, sell it to one of us and get the lighter one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StainTrain Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Even with this buffer/tube/spring i have listed here? It should. If not, just sell the buffer to one of us and buy the other one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher67 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 It should. If not, just sell the buffer to one of us and buy the other one. <thumbsup> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Croaker Posted November 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 (edited) 8) Edited December 17, 2014 by Croaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLKSHEEP Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 If this is strictly a bench gun weight is a good thing so why not go with a 20-22" barrel if you're concerned with milking every fps that you can get out of it? Although with length you get more barrel whip so a heaver contour would be better. <dontknow> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 (edited) The 39.0 IMR-4064 loads (#11 & #16) show the same stats for bot 16" & 20" so I figured there was a typo in that set. You caught me again , another Doooooo! , but they're data are next to each other , so it was an easy typo . I will edit & change them . 16" bbl.- 39 gr. 4064 , 175 gr. Nosler match , avg. vel.-2234 fps ES - 91 fps SD - 32 fps. 20" bbl. - 39 gr. 4064 , 175 gr. Nosler match , avg. vel. 2370 fps. ES - 82 fps. SD - 27 fps. Just so you know , both rifles were shooting 1/2" groups @ 100 yards off sand bag rests. To me the barrel length thing means nothing , unless you are going for the top limits in range for this cartridge . Edited November 27, 2014 by survivalshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Croaker Posted November 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 (edited) 8) Edited December 17, 2014 by Croaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted November 28, 2014 Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 Nice spread sheet . As long as we know , its not about just Velocity , its about how well the loading shoots consistently . I'm sure you know that having a consistent grouping load /rifle is far more important than how fast its goes. Running out of steam, in what sense ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Croaker Posted November 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) 8) Edited December 17, 2014 by Croaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted November 28, 2014 Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) WC846 Ball powder ( aporx. burn rate of BLC2 ) a slower burning powder than the extruded IMR 4064 , not sure about that one . First off , all loads were hand weighed to precisely the weights shown with a Pact Digital scale . There was a lot going on then just the components used , some fresh annealed brass was used & I think I specified that . All were trimmed to the exact trim to length of 2.005" . There were some Full length sized & Small Based sized , so it could have slight differences in the outcome , but these loads were for testing & working up a loading for BOTH rifles . I too don't want to have a different load for both rifles , but if you want to get the most out of any barrel/chamber/length , you will have to make different set ups for them . I really don't care what one load does to another as long as the end results are a consistent groups at all ranges .The reloads were posted just to show the comparisons between the two bbl. lengths & may or may not show the same results with another barrel/brand . Powder burn rates & a different primer can make much different pressures , thats why there are different sweet spots ( groups ) in any velocity/bullet powder combo. I'm not sure what your getting at , because I think you are over thinking this whole thing , my loadings were just for reference for my two different length barrels made by the same manufacturer. Also , we are talking about 308AR's , not Bolt action rifles . As far as losing steam , I don't want to be the one standing in front of any 30 cal. bullet @ 1000 yards , be it a supposedly tumbling 168 SMK or what ever. <thumbsup> Edited November 28, 2014 by survivalshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Croaker Posted November 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) 8) Edited December 17, 2014 by Croaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 WC 846 is a batch to batch load , your right my WC846 is close to BLC 2 , but I can't load 308's using WC 846 to the load data of BLC 2 . Its close & if you use the rule to start any powder 10-15 % above the lower load data , you can be safe enough using it . I have looked at least three burn charts & all there read the IMR 4064 as slower , but in my experience the Ball powders are all faster than Extruded . There are so many factors involved with changes in powder charges , that unless you have some very expensive monitoring equipment , you would not know the effects of charge weight changes & there effects on Velocity , Could also be changes in Bullet composition or variances in that batch of bullets . Even though I weigh my brass , it could have a factor in it also . Trying to find that needle in a haystack would be full time job . You whole question is about barrel length & which is best & that boils down to what you want to use it for . Bench rifle , go long , Hunting or Combat rifle , go short . The 308 is a very powerful cartridge & if keeping with normal ( rifle type , not pistol ) lengths , they will all reach out there. Of course I'm talking about well made barrels , not bargain basement barrels . Yes , I already miss not finding any WC 846 , its my go to powder & the 40 gr. charge ( with this batch of WC 846 ) its the best shooting in both , 16 & 20 " barrels , but a lot of others are close . The IMR 4895 with the Nosler 175 Match , was real respectable . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Croaker Posted November 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) 8) Edited December 17, 2014 by Croaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted November 30, 2014 Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 We require photo's of all builds & parts . <thumbsup> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelDeVille Posted January 25, 2015 Report Share Posted January 25, 2015 New to the 308 ar, and I decided on an 18" mid length. I shoot out to 500 regularly and 1000 when I have the opportunity. If I was limited to 500 I'd go with the 16" barrel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.