jtallen83 Posted September 23, 2021 Report Share Posted September 23, 2021 1 hour ago, Tack14 said: as fraudulent as 2020 was Iowa's Ron Paul delegates at the national convention, tossed aside by a back room deal and replaced with Romney supporters with no other reason given than "we need to show unity" That was my 2020, I worked hard on that election for over a year, actually decades of work to get to the point I could help, the people spoke, the party erased. 1 hour ago, Tack14 said: 'NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE GIVE A DAMN'? Not soon enough anyway. It will be interesting to see just what pain level will turn the tide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guruofhotrod Posted September 26, 2021 Report Share Posted September 26, 2021 I just ran across a link to this: https://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/09/military-courts-could-order-red-flag-gun-confiscation-under-defense-bill/ From what I see it looks like 135 REPUBLICAN members of the house voted for this! https://nationalfile.com/read-the-names-135-republicans-vote-with-democrats-to-advance-red-flag-gun-confiscation-bill-as-part-of-ndaa/ The senate needs to try to slam the brakes on this one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tack14 Posted September 28, 2021 Report Share Posted September 28, 2021 (edited) Yeah pirate eye from Texas (Crenshaw) claims he voted for it because that version of the bill was not going to be passed anyway. All these lies and excuses they tell us. I know/understand there are various votes that happen on legislation but either you are in favor of something or you're not. If you're not in favor of it, then you don't vote for it. Let there be no mistake about where you stand with your constituents. Not that I think there was any mistake.... Edited September 28, 2021 by Tack14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted October 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 SLOBODIAN: First you lose your guns, then your freedoms Armed citizens are a deterrent to politicians and bureaucrats hankering to subdue and control the masses, stripping them of basic freedoms. https://westernstandardonline.com/2021/09/slobodian-first-you-lose-your-guns-then-your-freedoms/ The day the Aussies gave up their guns triggered the beginning of the end of their liberty. Now the land Down Under is a full-blown police state. Proud, strong, free, productive Australia is gone. This harsh, bitter transformation should be a warning to nations still clinging to the God, guns, and freedoms the hard-core left deeply despises. Aussies protesting totalitarian COVID-19 restrictions, the harshest in the free world, are fighting a seemingly hopeless battle for basic rights and freedoms by pelting rocks, bottles, golf balls, and batteries against heavily armed riot police. It was a sad day in Melbourne Wednesday when police were ordered to fire rubber bullets into a crowd of 400 protesters, then arrested about 200 who face hefty $5,000 US fines. These are regular law-abiding citizens, including tradesmen protesting a two-week closure of building sites, mandatory vaccinations, stay-at-home orders, and a succession of lockdowns. They’re tired of being told they can’t go outside, can’t go to church, can’t travel far from home. Authorities claimed it wasn’t so much ordinary working people in the crowd police fired upon, but extremist and far-right groups infiltrating the protests. That’s often a tired lie, an excuse used to justify overstepping boundaries when annihilating freedom. The Australian government, with an insatiable hunger for control and compliance, is planning to soon implement an app using facial recognition software to track movements and location. Aussies will be randomly texted, having 15 minutes to take a photo in their location. If they don’t comply, police will show up. The riots are expected to continue. This is by no means an attempt to suggest people should arm themselves against police who are obliged to follow orders and face the violent consequences of bad political decisions while the decision-makers safely hide behind armed guards. Law-abiding gun owners aren’t the problem. Criminals with easy access to weapons are. Armed citizens are a deterrent to politicians and bureaucrats hankering to subdue and control the masses, stripping them of basic freedoms. Law-abiding gun ownership is a safeguard that must be protected at all costs. In Australia gun confiscation disguised as a buyback program was rushed through Parliament in 1996 after a nut job massacred 35 people with a semi-automatic rifle. Gun crimes have steadily escalated since. But still, only sportsmen, Roo Shooters, ranchers, and law enforcement officials are allowed to own guns. Owning a weapon for self-defense is a criminal offence in Australia. We don’t see the devastation and despair Australia is facing unfolding in places like Texas where gun laws are relaxed. Bad guys tend to behave better if they don’t know if someone is packing. In Texas, even grandma carries a handgun in a holder on her hip or shoulder or anywhere she likes, because the law says she can. In fact, as of September 1 this year Texas law requiring people to have a license to carry a handgun — open or concealed — was removed. Texans over the age of 21 with no criminal record or mental health issues may carry to protect themselves in most public places, excluding schools, hospitals, amusement parks, if the gun is holstered. Of course, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, an advocate of freedom and liberty, would never unleash law enforcement on law-abiding Texans. But politicians come and go. Laws are the constant safeguard unless citizens willingly forsake them to left-wing loons. Aussies bought the lie. And they are paying a horrific price. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is lying to Canadians. His ban on 1,500 types of so-called assault-style firearms in May 2020 didn’t satisfy him. He promised, if re-elected, to crack down on legal firearms owners in a number of ways including restricting high-capacity magazines to holding no more than five rounds, bribe provinces to implement a ban on handguns, and introduce Red Flag laws which would confiscate guns if someone thinks someone is a threat, or maybe just wants to be nasty. Trudeau wants to toughen laws on banned assault weapons and make it mandatory for owners to either sell the firearm to the government for destruction or have it rendered permanently inoperable. So, a buyback program. That sure did Australians a lot of good. Will Canadians relinquish this one guarantee of civil liberties and place our safety in the hands of untrustworthy politicians and bureaucrats? The choice is simple. What will it be Australia or Texas? Or is it the beginning of the end of liberty for Canada too? Slobodian is the Senior Manitoba Columnist for the Western Standardlslobodian@westernstandardonline.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.