survivalshop Posted August 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2015 (edited) LR PMag measurements. 20 rd. first gen. 25 rd. Gen 3 20 rd. Gen 3 These represent the smallest reading I could get from the individual mags . , so the Gen 3 20 rd. mags I have , there is a small but big difference in the width/thickness of the mag . Edited August 3, 2015 by survivalshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted August 6, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2015 (edited) The CMMG Lower with the Lancer & the 25rd. PMags feed with out a hitch , but I did have some failure to Eject , all with the 155 gr. Nosler Match loads & they are not light loads , maybe on the high side because there was slight cratering of the primer , not too flat but it was spread out a little . I had five total with the 155's , but none with the 168's , though to be fair ,I shot about 75 155's & about 20 168's , but I'm thinking this Bolt is still tight in the Carrier & may be some of it . I may use my other Bolt to see if that makes a difference , next time out . I am going to do a complete cleaning & inspection . I have built a lot of AR's & never had a problem with Ejection , that I can recall , but will see how the Ejector looks like , when Bolt is apart . every thing works the way it should . Had a 30-40 mph gusting wind & it shows on the grouping , one was a good group the rest , not so , but the rifle has potential , the Criterion Barrel seems to do its part , its me that is the problem . <dontknow> First group in the center I had no data , # 1 group is top left , # 2 is top right , # 3 is bottom left , # 4 is bottom right & # 5 is center bottom , with the aiming point at the bottom of the center line . Some Chronograph results with the 18" Criterion Barrel , just some data for my records , I was shooting the rifle to break it in , since I'm having problems with it at this time . Three strings of the same load , first one was still trying to get the new Magnetic chromo to read & finally found its position on the Barrel for it to read , with out errors messages . Case Bullet Powder chg.wt. Powder Avg. Vel. ES SD Primer make # 1 LC 155Match 43.2 Tac 2678 fps 20fps 14 fps CCI ( five shot ) # 2 LC 155 Match 43.2 Tac 2683 fps 34 fps 11 fps CCI ( five shot ) # 3 LC 155 Match 43.2 Tac 2664 fps 61 fps 23 fps CCI ( five shot ) # 4 LC 149 M80 42.8 ? 2773 fps 18 fps 9 fps ? ( only three shots ) # 5 FC 168 SMK 42.5 4064 2628 fps 15 fps 5 fps Fed. ( five shot ) Note , the Powder charges with the Tac were charged with my Redding micrometer Powder measure & I checked a lot & all were exactly 43.2 gr. .This barrel is also new so they may get better after a higher round count . Edited August 6, 2015 by survivalshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted August 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2015 Looks like every thing on the Bolt is OK ,might be the Extractor is holding the spent case too long , not sure at this time .I disassembled the Bolt & found nothing out of the ordinary , but did find some carbon on the inside of the Bolt Carrier where the gas rings seat . Since this is a used BC , I thought it was just discoloration inside from heat ( Chrome DPMS BC ) , but it was a build up of carbon , had to be scraped off & now the Bolt's gas rings feel & work better , which may have been the problem with Ejection . Barrel had some green come out of it in the first several patches with cleaner( not copper solvent ) on them , but cleaned up pretty easy . Nice & shinny in there after cleaning . Will test next week , with more test loads , may put them in the Reloading section & compare the three Barrels with the same loads . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted August 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 Range trip today with 155gr. Amax with 43 gr. of Tac , , Avg. was 2681 fps , ES -24 fps , SD -10 fps . , had some slightly cratered primers , so the loads are not on the light side . I had what seemed a failure to Eject every other round . I posted on the DWilson Bolt thread in 'Parts " section . I replaced the Extractor with a new DPMS one & it didn't make a difference , I didn't have my tool for Ejector removal , so I couldn't replace it , I did have a new Ejector & Spring with me . I did bring my spare Test Bolt , a complete DPMS Bolt , well used , I changed it out & the rifle functioned flawlessly , even with 20 rd. mag dumps . I replaced the DWilson Bolts , Ejector & Spring when I got back & took some measurements of the new , old & DWilson components & read the thread in " Parts " section of DWilson Bolts , to get the info . Its got to be an issue with the Ejector Spring , iMO . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted August 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2015 I can say , I 'm digging the Lancer Mags , they work like a charm , also the Magpul 25 rd. Gen.3 mags work also , this is a first with this CMMG Lower , it always liked & worked with Metal Mags , just didn't like the Plastic ones . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.