survivalshop Posted July 9, 2016 Report Share Posted July 9, 2016 Well we did a 180 as far as the M16/M4 is concerned & I for one think its a good thing mostly . Those who remember the " Mad Minute " this will bring back memories . Its all about fire control . http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21739/us-army-m4-carbine-m4a1/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted July 18, 2016 Report Share Posted July 18, 2016 Sweet Mary, Mother of Jesus... I remember arguing about M4 versus M4A1 to idiots on this very board about 4-ish years ago. Idiots said all M4s were the same, I argued the point that SOF was the only contingent with M4A1-spec'd carbines, and it turned into a shitstorm here. ...This is now news in 2016 - from a "study" in fukking 2006?! - and they're FINALLY progressing with the fukking upgrades?! Gotta be kidding me. Some infantry units got the heavy barrel and other small schit years ago, the KAC rail, etc.. Those weren't M4A1s, though. I feel vindicated, now, after having my dick kicked in about "arguing with people just to start something..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted July 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2016 98 , I really don't think you ever got your dick kicked in ( well ,maybe by a woman ) I come from a time that there were three positions on the M16 & none of them were three shot burst ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikedaddyH Posted July 18, 2016 Report Share Posted July 18, 2016 Like this ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.