Hotwrench

I haven't been here in years, but things seem to be the same 98 is still chasing people away. See yall in a few more years to see if anything has changed.

The VCIN (Va Criminal Information Network) is way behind and may report false information about a your Va. CHP. being valid. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1925653834126229&id=100000448923278&refid=28&_ft_=qid.6562668960521594895%3Amf_story_key.2401582519132745159%3Atop_level_post_id.1021572221327471%3Asrc.22&__tn__=*s*s-R

I have never had a misfire with a classic Sig and once when I inadvertently "proof tested" a 220 it never stuttered and continued working with no damage. So in short their classic line has worked well for me. Maybe in a few more years when the market has finished beta testing them I will try a striker fired Sig, I doubt it but anything is possible.

Truer words were never spoken! The only exception I am aware of is that fine institute of higher learning, The School of Hard Knocks. I earned a P.H.D. (post hole digger)there. I now have most of the farm fenced.

Sounds about right, most Americans don't get much of an education these days aren't you glad you had the opportunity.

Now I am confused, I don't know him, never took any of his courses or read his books. An internet site lists the following: EDUCATION: Cornell College, Iowa, BA Biology, Chemistry, 1967 U.S.M.C. Commissioned Second Lieutenant, 1968 Wisconsin Dept. Of Justice, Narcotics and Dangerous Drug Enforcement, 1971 Western Wisconsin Technical Institute. Certified Police Officer, 1971 U. S. Marine Corps Institute, Land Mines, Explosives and Demolitions, 1972 Wisconsin Dept. Of Justice, Motor Vehicle Search And Seizure, 1974 Wisconsin Dept. Of Health, Certified Emergency Medical Technician, 1975 Western Wisconsin Technical Institute, Associate Degree, Mechanical Engineering, 1975 Illinois Dept. Of Law Enforcement, Defensive Tactics, 1977 U. S. Army Infantry Advanced Course, Ft. Benning, Georgia, 1977 National Rifle Assn. Certified Police Instructor, 1977 to present American Pistol Institute, Practical Defensive Handgun, 1979 National Rifle Assn. Certified Police Armorer, 1980 U. S. Army Command And General Staff College, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, 1980 American Society Of Industrial Security, Current Terrorist Tactics, 1982 CERTIFIED NRA Certified Police Firearms Instructor Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor, International Assn. Of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors Distinguished Expert, National Forensic Center Individual Voluntary Practical Pistol Instructor Certified Instructor, Certified User, Special Purpose Low-Lethality Anti-Terrorist Munitions (SPLLATM-ASI) Monadnock PR-24 Instructor Glock Pistol Armorer Colorado State Board Private Occupational Credential For Security Services PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Police Marksman Association Distinguished Experts, National Forensic Center International Assn. Of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors American Society Of Law Enforcement Trainers National Rifle Association He looks like one of the good guys. What am I missing?

If my conduct caused you any concerns I offer my sincere apologies to you. I would like to express my sorrow at what you and your area must be experiencing after the preventable horror you have been forced to experience.

No Picture

I am not sure if that is all there is. I do know it is self promotion since his organization wrote the article. He claims internal fufu work.

Most of you probably read Ammoland but if you don't or missed it they had this: Farnam Signature 308 Operator Rifle in 7.62×51 https://www.ammoland.com/2018/05/farnam-signature-308-operator-rifle-in-308-update/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=361efa9dba-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-361efa9dba-20764569#axzz5GtdRfRy5

Damn, I wanted that job but with all the competition I am just out gunned. Oh well I can always find anothe position.

I am sure it's just rumor and propaganda but I was told that .308ar.com has a person that delights in stirring poop. Again just rumor and propaganda.

Original intent , written by geniuses, now practised by few.

Plus one!

In my opinion we are real close now. Just try traveling across this country while not violating any gun laws. A small example, in Virginia some counties make a loaded rifle in your vehicle an offense, some don't. This is a law that has to do with hunting. Do you want to bet they wouldn't prosecute a non hunter if it served the agenda . I am sure that with the current patch work of law we have in place not many of us aren't guilty of some violation at any given time. Our Congress didn't even pass reciprocity and I doubt there will ever be a better chance. What kind of chance would an even broader law have for enactment? Lets start with a nice clean slate, shall not infringe. If you murder, rob and rape have a trial, if guilty go to jail and perhaps if you repay the ones you wronged (not counting murder) and show true remorse you get to rejoin society. Simple to say but I am sure hard to enact.

Plus one!

My wifes comment: Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they arent out to get you.

No argument from me. You are definitely not being paranoid in my view. Thanks for the research.

I will use yet another bit of country wisdom, I will consider the source.

Really, that is in common use where I come from and I never saw anyone take it as a slam before. But it points out a useful thing, communication is hard when it takes place between people with different cultural backgrounds, in this case east coast country and I guess west coast unknown. Don't be so easily offended, if you don't understand follow another piece of east coast country advice, let the rough side drag.

Our government is supposed to have three branches. The decision as I understand it says weapons in common use. Don't count the founding fathers out, they wrote 240 year old documents that have worked well for 240 years.

Thanks, your reply is better than the one I had in mind. To quote you. "This license idea is compromise and I have seen how well compromise works in the past. " 98, quit trying to put lipstick on that pig. Quote, " The framework I’m proposing is essentially a grand bargain: The gun control side gives up the possibility of a federal gun registry, specific states abandon their weapon bans and long gun registries, and in exchange the gun rights side accepts a brand new federal licensing scheme with real teeth." Do you really think several states(Cali for instance) are going to be willing to give ground to that extent? Do you think the Fed's wouldn't take advantage of an easy data base that contained most gun owners, unlike the present system that at least makes it lllegal to copy the 4473's and retain them at the Fed level? The legislation will get beat to death in the process of being written and it would be a just registration scheme if we were lucky and skilful. Have you ever sat in a committee meeting and watched the wrangling that goes on while a bill is getting passed through a committee? The outcome depends totally on the makeup of the committee, if it has a bad for us majority an unrecognizable piece of legislation goes to the floor for a vote. Then the process starts again, if the House or Senate at the time has the wrong majority the legislation gets basterdized some more. Even if the mix is right in the committee, the House or the Senate, how many politicians have the technical knowledge to understand the subject matter, even some of the "good ones" don't know a bolt from a reciever. I would call it a crap shoot to get a recognizable piece of legislation through but in craps you at least know the odds. With the self serving "public servants" we have now, who could figure the odds of good legislation resulting? That process is part of the reason medicine is in its present state, the insurance companies controlled the legislation to their advantage. Do you think the big money wouldn't come out and control this legislation that we are discussing? NTXshooter, I am glad you got involved, even if you don't agree. 98 maybe you and NTXshooter are right in that jtallen's plan is too slow but in the mean time go at it a piece at a time instead of a big unmanageable chunk while practising his outline.

Like I said, I read it under your post. If that isn't enough to suit you go pound sand. You are the one pushing this idiocy and you are a one girl, girl scout troop on this issue, no one else seems to agree.

I wish I had 300 - 400 yards to practice on. Welcome from The Old Dominion.