planeflyer21 Posted November 2, 2016 Report Posted November 2, 2016 Danney Williams, Bill Clinton's illegitimate son, is requesting his pa's DNA from Monica's blue dress. http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/illegitimate-son-of-bill-clinton-wants-dna-from-blue-dress/
DNP Posted November 2, 2016 Report Posted November 2, 2016 I'm definitely curious to see how it turns out. Where's Maury when you need him? that poor guy is going to have a hard time dealing with it if he finds out his mom lied to him.
jtallen83 Posted November 2, 2016 Report Posted November 2, 2016 His mother was a prostitute by her own admission, how could he be suprised if she doesn't know for a fact who his father is? Love the press Bill is getting no matter how it works out though
planeflyer21 Posted November 2, 2016 Author Report Posted November 2, 2016 I don't know if he is or isn't. Kinda looks like Bill. Also kinda looks like Roger Clinton.
jtallen83 Posted November 3, 2016 Report Posted November 3, 2016 1 hour ago, survivalshop said: That DNA may be useless by now . Results are well documented, all they need is the paperwork for comparison, no need to retest.
planeflyer21 Posted November 3, 2016 Author Report Posted November 3, 2016 1 hour ago, jtallen83 said: Results are well documented, all they need is the paperwork for comparison, no need to retest. I'm just wondering if when they harvest Danney's DNA if she's going to wear the dress again.
survivalshop Posted November 3, 2016 Report Posted November 3, 2016 4 hours ago, jtallen83 said: Results are well documented, all they need is the paperwork for comparison, no need to retest. You are referring to DNA results recorded at some other point in time . I didn't know they did any on that dress , that's different & if used in Public trial or inquiry , are they not public record & he should have no issue getting them . Makes one wonder .
mrmackc Posted November 3, 2016 Report Posted November 3, 2016 results were reported as positive for WJC but the actual data was not released, that I know of.
jtallen83 Posted November 3, 2016 Report Posted November 3, 2016 Two test were run on the dress for Kenneth Starr's investigation, results for the more basic test were made public and the more in depth test result was not made public other than a note that it was performed. They don't need the dress just a subpoena for the more in depth test results. http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/no-definitive-dna-test-ever-conducted-on-clinton-son/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/eviblood092298.htm
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now