Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

Recommended Posts

Posted

Every gun argument in court need only focus on 4 little words. 

Shall not be infringed. 

 

Can we just discuss those few words for a minute, before you start thinking about your ruling?  This 2-1 decision is hardly a win yet, but any non-loss is better than a loss. 

Posted

This is great news.  Coming from the communist 9th. Circus Court of Appeals it's nothing less than totally mind-blowing.

Somebody in Hawaii must've really pissed the 9th. Circus off. :thumbup:

Posted
On 7/25/2018 at 2:16 PM, 98Z5V said:

That decision looks like it actually takes a step further than Heller!

Actually it does, IMHO.

I cannot help but wonder it there's a "catch" ... ???  Like they're giving us this to keep from giving us something better like national carry.  It would be just like those clowns to pull something like that.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, GRA said:

Actually it does, IMHO.

I cannot help but wonder it there's a "catch" ... ???  Like they're giving us this to keep from giving us something better like national carry.  It would be just like those clowns to pull something like that.

 

Which probably means they're fighting a rear-guard action. They know they're losing.

Posted
Just now, mineralman55 said:

Which probably means they're fighting a rear-guard action. They know they're losing.

Yes I think you may very well be right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...