shibiwan Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 (edited) Trying to figure out some 300 AAC reloads for a buddy. He got these guys from another of his friends. They shoot but don't cycle properly. I've taken apart and reverse engineered my fair share of bullets and haven't seen anything like this being done on a 300 AAC. Probably explains why those rounds don't shoot for poop. What I've got so far: Load #1 - Federal 180gr Trophy Bonded Tip bullet (who even sells these? Never seen them available) - 5.56 converted case - 9.5 gr of a super coarse extruded powder. The load was so compressed I had to "dig" it out with a sharp tool. Load #2 - 147gr FMJ-BT bullet - 5.56 converted case - 18.5 gr of the same powder. Again the load was super compressed and had to be dug out. Here's a pic of that crap. Anyone have any clue what powder the guy's using? IMR4227? Doesn't look like it.... thoughts? Edited August 26, 2014 by shibiwan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Some kind of heavy stick powder, that's for sure. What was the loaded COAL on these two rounds? Do you have any more you can measure? On that 147 load, that seems HEAVY, at 18.5 grains. My 150s are running 16.1 grains of H110 (not compressed) - that charge weight he's using is really gonna depend on the powder, too. If you have some chrono velocities and the COAL, it would be alot easier to narrow down the powder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shibiwan Posted August 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 (edited) 52.84mm (2.080") for the 180 gr 53.21mm (2.095") for the 147gr Heavy definitely on the 18.5 gr with the 147 FMJ's. Still, 300 AAC's have issues with powder selection when you hit the 150gr mark. Choose the wrong powder and it no likey. Underpowered is how I felt about the 9.5gr in the 180gr. I think it's the wrong powder too. No chrono though. Not until my bd :D ... then again I'm too lazy for it. Buddy is hooked on my 220gr subs. Gave him a small handful to play with a coupe weeks ago and today he brings me this crap that doesn't cycle (I've test fired them previously) and wants me to "do these like you do yours". <laughs> <lmao> [edit] forgot to add.....the following link is handy/useful for reloaders: http://www.precisionreloading.net/ The smokeless powder database is handy. Edited August 26, 2014 by shibiwan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 I've been running the Hornady 150gr FMJ BTs at 2.090", and the 150gr SMKs at 2.125" - same charge weight of 16.1gr H110. I quit using the SMKs and only load the Hornady 150s now, and every batch I bring them out another 0.010", and check 10 from the batch on a target grouping. They're getting better thus far. They started at 2.060", cannelure all the way down to the case mouth (cases originally cut and prepped to 1.363"). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planeflyer21 Posted August 26, 2014 Report Share Posted August 26, 2014 Looks like Alliant Reloader powder, hard to say what number though without a reference. The higher the number, the bigger the little cylinders of powder. Use the Reloader 7 for .30-30...fairly small. Seen the Reloader 19 used in .300 Win Mag and it DWARFS the RL7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.308LiteHunter Posted August 27, 2014 Report Share Posted August 27, 2014 Whatever powder it is, those cylinders aren't very consistent. Looks like what my goat leaves behind. Is that from the compressed load? I've used R12 could be the same size and about the same color, also similar to IMR 4895 but the cylinders with those 2 powders are very uniform. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripledeuce Posted August 27, 2014 Report Share Posted August 27, 2014 Those grains look crushed from being compressed. No telling what powder it is. Respectfully Terry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted August 27, 2014 Report Share Posted August 27, 2014 (edited) Shib, you had two different pics of that stuff up yesterday - from both loads - can you repost those two? With all those pics in this thread, Gibbs should be able to scratch-n-sniff his monitor and tell you what the powder is. I'm just sayin'... Edited August 27, 2014 by 98Z5V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shibiwan Posted August 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2014 This one? I figure it's gonna be time consuming re-doing all that crap ammo and save it for another time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted August 27, 2014 Report Share Posted August 27, 2014 The 9.5 gr. load was probably meant for sub sonic , its hard to tell what powder it is by looks . There could be completely different make up for burn time & pressure & still look alike . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
392heminut Posted August 28, 2014 Report Share Posted August 28, 2014 That's definitely not IMR4227, it's way too coarse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted August 28, 2014 Report Share Posted August 28, 2014 Shib, I'd tell the guy just to go pop all those off - unless they're WAY overpressured. That compressed 147gr load with 18.5 grs in it - I'd watch that one. I'd shoot one, once, and really check that brass close. If it's safe, just cap them off and reload the brass after that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.