BLKSHEEP

Nice!!.....your name wouldn't happen to be JODI, JODY or MAILMAN would it? My table \/ \/ \/ :)) :huh: :bat:

Ragheads hate dogs & pigs. Release the hound!!

#1 and #2 (1 each) in XXL please. Thanks.

Good effort, but I fear a waste of time.http://youtu.be/r1GrdTakvl8

From what I hear they're not good to eat but it would of made a nice mount. It may have died from damage to its gills, not a very good way to handle a trophy fish for catch & release.

Like a boss!! http://youtu.be/OdnHGm5VGwM

^^^^ Ding,Ding,Ding we have a winner!! That's pure hell, I refuse to even go down there unless I absolutely have to for work. I work for a engineering firm, my boss is the Big bosses wife. You get the picture :stfu2:

We use to get a quarter :o , my ninja days are yet to come <thumbsup> Hemi, you're getting off lite. This is what its going to cost me to send my wife & 3yr. old son to the Philippines. That's booking 6 months in advance through Orbitz :ifly:

^^^ I'm a Tail man myself B)

Y'all slacking up....Caption this.............

No, you're not wrong, 4x isn't enough to get out to 600 yards effectively. The "so called" rule of thumb is 1x for every 100 yards. Imo that is a minimum, most people including myself prefer 2x for every 100 yards so using the 2x formula you would be best suited with a 12 power +- optic. There are plenty of 2-10,3-12,3-15x scopes with various reticles & other options to choose from depending on your budget. I recommend reading this> http://demigodllc.com/articles/practical-long-range-rifle-shooting-optics/?p=1 before you purchase anything. Then if you haven't already check out these websites... http://www.brownells.com/optics-mounting/scopes/rifle-scopes/index.htm http://swfa.com/Riflescopes-C1443.aspx http://www.midwayusa.com/find?sortby=1&itemsperpage=24&minprice=300&maxprice=2000&dimensionids=4294846258&dimensionids=4294846174&dimensionids=4294846271&dimensionids=4294845307&dimensionids=4294845822&dimensionids=4294846185&dimensionids=4294846281&dimensionids=4294846203&dimensionids=4294845805&dimensionids=4294845998&dimensionids=4294845915&dimensionids=4294846286&dimensionids=4294846153&newcategorydimensionid=11493 http://www.opticsplanet.com/vortex-viper-pst-4-16x50-riflescopes.html http://www.opticstalk.com/rifle-scopes_forum2.html More info... An FFP scope has a reticle that changes size with magnification. The advantage of this is that with a reticle with sub tensions, such as a mil-dot reticle, the sub tensions (distance between markings) are always relative to the target size. In other words, if 2 mils covers the target @ 10X, 2 mils cover the target @ 5X. With an SFP scope, the reticle never changes size so zooming out to 5X would mean 2 mils would only cover half the target. The disadvantage of a reticle that changes size is that the hash marks (and sometimes the reticle lines) get hard to see at low magnification. However, most manufacturers allow for this by including thicker outer bars so that at low mag the scope functions like a typical duplex reticle. Another advantage because of the sub tensions always remaining relative to the target size is that no matter what the magnification is you can adjust the scope or the turrets based on what you see through the reticle. If you see that your shot was 2 mils to the left you can either move the scope over 2 mils to the right or dial in 2 mils of correction. This can be done on an SFP scope, but only on its ranging power. Mil/mil just means that the turrets match the reticle. It could just as well be MOA/MOA or something else. The advantage here is that you have fewer calculations to do because there is no need to convert from one system to another. The Vortex PSTs are good scopes backed by a reputable company with a great customer service reputation. You could go either way with the reticles and most buyers probably choose one over the other based on what they're used to. Personally, I prefer mils because I think the calculations are a little easier since mils are a decimally-based system. Mils are, however, somewhat coarser than 1/4 MOA clicks (1/10 mil = .36" @ 100 yards vs .26" for 1/4 MOA). In my experience, that hardly matters for most shooting applications.

The boogie man...

^^ :))

^^^^ +1 for Bayou Tactical <thumbsup>

DAMNNN^^^^ Hott chicks with guns :drool:

As stated above give us a budget to work with, without knowing that I'll throw this out there. For the distance you specified this is a very good scope that wont break the bank ,NIKON M-308 http://www.policestore.com/optics-laser-sights/rifle-scopes/m-308-4-16x42-riflescopes-prod55012.aspx if your budget allows more check out the Vortex PST line and Weaver Tactical http://www.policestore.com/optics-laser-sights/rifle-scopes/viper-1-4x24-pst-rifle-scope-prod42369.aspx or Leupold Mark4 http://www.policestore.com/optics-laser-sights/rifle-scopes/mark-4-lr-t-rifle-scopes-prod42641.aspx http://swfa.com/Weaver-3-15x50-Tactical-30mm-Rifle-Scope-P49448.aspx Also are you looking for FFP or 2nd FP , MOA/MOA or MIL/MIL adjustments?

But how do you really feel......

Here's a very good (imo) review from Sniper Central between the SS HD & Vortex Razor HD..... http://www.sniperforums.com/forum/optics/36049-field-test-ss-5-20-hd-vs-vortex-razor-hd-5-20-a.html

^^^That's going to make you think twice next time you tell one "UP AGAINST THE WALL AND SPREAD UM" <lmao>

jrtmasp is GTG!

EasyEJL is GTG!

Planeflyer21 ? :))

It's suppose to fit the rifle length <dontknow> http://store.magpul.com/product/MAG308/181

Well done!

Welcome Paul, man that Mosin is sweet!