I don’t know if I could say I would do things differently, if I were placed in the EXACT same circumstance. A handicap man is violently assaulted by a much younger, and much larger, physically fit man.
If the handicap man was quicker on the draw, and shot the still advancing assailant, this wouldn’t be debated. Fact is, he was basically “sucker punched” and reacted out of fear. Which is the only necessary element to respond with lethal force.
in Cuckifornia the CCW, junior lawyer, idiots are voiding their bowels over this. In their domesticated brains they are calllng for criminal charges and supporting prosecution.
Our case is, and always has been, “an armed society is a peaceful society”. If this school of thought was more recognized, then perhaps more people wouldn’t be so quick to initiate with physical violence. If every azzhole thought that every victim was potentially armed, and the law was designed to protect the person in fear, then the propensity for violence either disappears or the offenders are eventually eliminated.