98Z5V

Update: There is fallout, from that bad decision...

There isn't anybody around that can explain shiit like Brandon Herrera can...

Her whole life will be a waste... Wonder what she's worth?...

It's everything leading up to 19 April, 1775. That was it. That specific day. And everything that followed after it. 4th of July, 1776, is when it all came around to the paperwork. It's a great watch. Every American should have to watch it every single year. IMHFO.

I've stated it many times, it's just a math problem. If you have an accurate gun, and accurate ammo, you've solved Internal Ballistics. After that, it's just shooting fundamentals, weather - there's your External Ballistics. It's just Nerd Magic. It's a math problem, that needs solved. Well, watch THIS Nerd Magic... backwards engineered. You don't fuk with TiborasaurusRex. (NOTE: DO NOT, IN ANY WAY... confuse TiborasaurusRex, with this new YT fuqr "T.Rex Arms". That little Botkin fuq. NOT the same... )

I watch this every single 4th of July, brother. Good call.

^^^ In reference to that - talk about Ironic... TODAY, July 3rd, the NRA filed direct suit against the Biden Administration over the pistol brace rule. You can read about it on the NRA website, but you have to go through an age-verification check. Also, directly inside that MRA article, it links you to this Fox News article: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nra-slaps-biden-admin-lawsuit-unlawful-pistol-brace-rule Published July 3, 2023 4:43pm EDT NRA slaps Biden admin with lawsuit over 'unlawful' pistol brace rule ATF's pistol brace rule has been in the crosshairs of Republicans, gun-rights groups since January FIRST ON FOX – The National Rifle Association of America slapped the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives with a lawsuit over a rule that regulates stabilizing braces for pistols. In a lawsuit filed Monday, the NRA aims to expose "the failings of the new rule – which subjects law-abiding gun owners to penalties, fines, and potential prison sentences for the use of an otherwise legal plastic apparatus on some firearms." "The NRA has ramped up its offense on this arbitrary and unconstitutional rule," NRA Executive Vice President & CEO Wayne LaPierre said. "We are confident in our ability to confront the ATF and [the Department of Justice] – and preserve freedom for NRA members." The NRA previously submitted comments in opposition to the rule, filed a motion to intervene in another legal action and supported a lawsuit by several state attorneys general filed in North Dakota. Pistol braces are accessories that can be attached to the rear of a gun to make it easier to aim and fire with one hand. The accessories are often used by disabled veterans. The ATF rule categorizes pistols with braces as short-barreled rifles, which require a federal license to own. NRA argues in its complaint that the rule is unconstitutional, as the ATF reverses its long-standing position that pistol braces do not transform pistols into rifles subject to onerous registration and taxation requirements under the National Firearms Act. The NRA is asking a district court in Texas for a preliminary, and ultimately permanent, injunctive relief restraining ATF from enforcing the rule against law-abiding NRA members. ATF Director Steven Dettelbach and U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland are also named defendants in the lawsuit. First announced in January 2023, the final rule was set to go into effect June 1, 2023. Gun rights groups and the state of Texas sued the government and have now been granted preliminary injunctive relief from that final rule. The NRA now seeks "recognition of the irreparable harm its members also face" from the rule. The NRA has approximately 350,000 members in Texas. According to the complaint, many NRA members are being irreparably harmed by the final rule because they are forced to modify their firearms, destroy them, register them or surrender them to the federal government under threat of criminal prosecution. "The NRA is pursuing every possible avenue in defense of its law-abiding members and their constitutional freedoms," said William A. Brewer III, counsel to the NRA. "Our members should be free of the threat of enforcement of this presumptively unlawful rule. We are confident that we will prevail in obtaining the same relief for them that has already been granted to members of other gun rights groups." In June, House Republicans, with the help of two Democrats, passed a resolution that would nullify ATF's final rule and prevent the ATF from reintroducing the same rule in the future. The resolution is now headed to the Senate. If passed by the Senate – an unlikely scenario given the political makeup – and subsequently vetoed by Biden, the House and Senate would need a two-thirds majority vote to override the presidential veto. The ATF declined to comment on pending litigation.

NICE!!!

Ironically, I have information on such subjects. For a man of your stature (I'm definitely not sayin' you're a small man)... For a shooting mat that MIGHT fit you, is well made, well padded, and can double as a sleep mat - VooDoo Tactical. This one: https://voodootactical.com/shooters-mats/advanced-shooters-mat/ For the bag, it's back at Armageddon Gear, and Tom Fuller. Seriously. Schmedium bag, heavy fill. It's over 8lbs. I run it monthly, love it, and wouldn't shoot off any obstacle from anything else. It's pricey. But, it can't be replicated, for what it does. No way. This one: https://armageddongear.com/product/shmedium-mid-size-game-changer/

So, the NRA has been shut out. They filed to have NRA members included in these cases, and the NRA has been denied. Once they saw the first case, 5th Circuit and FPC decision. FPC asked for clarification to the judge, and the judge clarified that the "plaintiffs" in the case actually DID include all FPC members. Glad I'm a member of FPC. The following cases followed that pattern, and members of those organizations were included in the injunctions against the BATFE. Now, NRA was never specifically named as a plaintiff in any suit, but they provided a BUNCH of money in the SAF lawsuit. SAF is specifically named, they brought the suit, NRA backed them with a dufflebag full of money, but NRA didn't initially name themselves in the suit. Now, the only one left that hasn't been decided is the FRAC suit. NRA is backing that one with another dufflebag full of money. FRAC is a plaintiff, NRA was not initially named as a plaintiff. NRA filed to have themselves included in the FRAC suit, and has been shut out. NRA members are not covered in any preliminary injunctions. FPC, SAF, GOA members - are covered in these injunctions. FRAC, still undecided, but NRA members will not be included, however that decision goes. Here's the rundown:

That's a really shitty situation...

This Officer is a badass. I love this. Today's society is so fucked up, and they keep doing it. I don't know how they do it - in today's world. Seriously. This is awesome. At 9:30 into the vid, pay attention to what Mike Glover says about Adrenaline and Cortisol... we've talked about that here before...

There's more, brother. I'm on this BS like that fat kid and the cupcake. Here's another opinion: That Rahimi case - if you guys want to talk about that, I can go into that in great depth. Just do research first, after you all look it up. You need to know the difference between the Lautenberg Amendment, and the Brady Act. There's a very, very distinct difference between those two, and that's what the Rahimi case is about. The MSM isn't going to tell you the difference - they're gonna treat you like a mushroom. Keep you in the dark, and feed you bullshiit...

Here something that DID happen yesterday, 30 Jun. Frame and Receiver Final Rule = VACATED. This is what's coming for the BATFE, and their Pistol Brace Final Rule. No other way around it. Also, the US Supreme Court has agreed to take up the Rahimi case, in their next session. This will be a good one.

I'm buying this for @JBMatt. He NEEDS this bag. He's on vacation right now, and might not see this for a few days, which is an addition bonus... https://armageddongear.com/product/numero-uno/ When you can only have one support bag in a rifle match or on a secret combat mission, it better be the NUMERO UNO from Armageddon Gear! Made from Milspec solution-dyed rhinoceros calfskin and printed in official Crye Precision Multicam using low-IR-reflectivity processes and materials, the NUMERO UNO is the last shooting support you’ll ever need. Ultra-lightweight unicorn feathers fill the bag to just the right amount of firmness for optimum support without slowing you down…much. If you’re as smart as we are you’ll add a NUMERO UNO to your range bag each time you go shooting. Well, you can’t actually put it *in* your range bag since this thing is so huge, but take it with you, at least. Quick-release buckles on each shoulder strap allow you to attach the NUMERO UNO to the roof rack on your car since it won’t really fit inside there either. So, whether you’re thumbing your nose at the match director’s BS gear rules or smoking tangos on clandestine sniper ops, the NUMERO UNO is the one and only support bag you’ll ever need. **Ships only within the US** Sorry, we cannot ship international Here's a vid. Matt needs this, badly. P.S. Tom Fuller is a complete badass, in real life. Look him up. I've spent a brief time in my life sitting on a hillside in Afghani-Land with him, pondering world politics and military logistics applications. Interesting talks.

^^^ Reminds me of this bad motherfucker... Look at this dude. Here's the video of it all... https://www.instagram.com/reel/CtndV5pLcsr/ *gotta click it...

They make great gear, brother, you will NOT be disappointed in the least.

He hit that nail DIRECTLY on the fuckin' head!

The Mock v Garland hearing did happen today in 5th Circuit. Decision isn't published yet. On the official 5th Circuit website, the latest updates are from 28 June. We'll see what happens. Here's a rundown on the hearing today.

Keep your fuckin' eye on the ball... Watch what the other side is doing, in retaliation... I'm just sayin'... There are only a few good attorneys out there - we're keeping our eyes on the good ones, and getting that information out to the masses...

Wonderful legal opinion for CA gun owners. ^^^ That will help that lawyer, as a WA lawyer, just due to the gun-stoopidity in WA State. It's a win for the entire country, if this goes forward.

I have info about that conversation that started around 2hr 18 minutes, too... I'm just sayin'...

1hr 57 minutes, he kinda talks about it. That was my deployment. There's alot more to that story. Alot more.

1hr 23:00 minutes. Hit that mark. Starts something. John Macejunas (proper spelling). I think I've mentioned him here before, yeah, know I have. Mace. He's Kryptonite. Crazy story meeting him, but I've talked about it here before, in the past.

I may have an update to this post - still watching it. I wanna see if he talks about it. If he doesn't, in this podcast, then I will.