dirigoboy Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 From Forbes on-line, the latest challenge from the U.N. >:(http://blogs.forbes.com/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-should-have-all-gun-owners-up-in-arms/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgecrusher Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 i'm sorry sir, to which guns are you referring to? i can't seem to find any. >:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayGun19 Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 The only reason any member of the U.N. would vote FOR disarming the American public can only be the opposite of why no other country (re: communist) has ever invaded us in modern times. If the majority of citizens are armed, it would be house-to-house fighting and not worth the cost to an invading force. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madhouse Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 And that is probably exactly why many UN member countries would like to disarm our population, so they can bring a ground fight to us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayGun19 Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 Well, that would be just stupid on their part, even if the general populace was dumb enough to turn in their firearms. There are Veterans all over this country who would bury their rifles and some ammunition and stand at the ready to fight. Just say'n. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt.Cross Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 Full-on disarmament would never work and they know it full well. They will have to wait for our government to slowly and surely disarm us through regulations. It might take a while, but as long as the majority of the American citizens keeps allowing it, it'll happen. Myself, I intend to be an outlaw once guns are outlawed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onebigelf Posted June 10, 2011 Report Share Posted June 10, 2011 Remember that: 1) the Senate has to ratify treaties before they take effect. 2) the Supreme Court has not ruled in the past that treaties supersede the Constitution, and the liberals still only have 4 pet justices to change that.John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 And that is probably exactly why many UN member countries would like to disarm our population, so they can bring a ground fight to us.Bring it. <thumbsup>All my stuff was purchased legally, is owned legally, and it'll take some serious poop for someone to try to take it away from me. Come and get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NL7CO Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 And some of it is even at the house. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayGun19 Posted June 12, 2011 Report Share Posted June 12, 2011 I hate to use an already overused slogan, but Molon Labe!! I've been seeing that on t-shirts and bumper stickers almost as much as "Don't Tread On Me". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.