Sisco Posted March 2, 2017 Report Posted March 2, 2017 41 minutes ago, planeflyer21 said: And Brazil. Seen some canned beef from Uraguay or some such too. Survived on that stuff in college. Back then in the Jurassic it was 5 cans for $1. Probably better I didn't know much back then. Actually not much beef comes up from Argentina anymore. Most of it goes to Europe. Same with Uraguay.
Sisco Posted March 2, 2017 Report Posted March 2, 2017 On February 28, 2017 at 8:31 AM, ARTrooper said: I have always wanted an aquaponics setup! An offer we put in on a house was just accepted, so maybe I will be able to build one in a year or two. :) When you are ready, let me know and I will put you in contact with the Wisconsin Sea Grant Aquaculture outreach specialist and he can help you with any questions and issues. Also the state aquaculture association
Sisco Posted March 3, 2017 Report Posted March 3, 2017 40 minutes ago, Sisco said: Survived on that stuff in college. Back then in the Jurassic it was 5 cans for $1. Probably better I didn't know much back then. Actually not much beef comes up from Argentina anymore. Most of it goes to Europe. Same with Uraguay. Actually my mistake they are being allowed back in since 2015. FDA says they have safeguards in place now to prevent hoof and mouth and mad cow. Uraguay and Brazil were never stopped.
ARTrooper Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 On 3/2/2017 at 5:28 PM, Sisco said: On 2/28/2017 at 8:31 AM, ARTrooper said: I have always wanted an aquaponics setup! An offer we put in on a house was just accepted, so maybe I will be able to build one in a year or two. :) When you are ready, let me know and I will put you in contact with the Wisconsin Sea Grant Aquaculture outreach specialist and he can help you with any questions and issues. Also the state aquaculture association sounds good brother. might be a while, but definitely in the plans.
planeflyer21 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Posted March 4, 2017 The computer projections on this video, along with fish having tumors and bleeding from the gills, is even worse than the other video:
jtallen83 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 300 tons a day???? If the source of the radiation cannot be stopped because it is not accessible then how do they get the figure of 300 tons a day?
unforgiven Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 Planets been turned into a toilet into a short period of time look up any DNR fishing regulation book and see all the restrictions on eating many types of game fish. From Lake trout/salmon to pan fish, with pregnant women and children most affected.
planeflyer21 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Posted March 4, 2017 35 minutes ago, jtallen83 said: 300 tons a day???? If the source of the radiation cannot be stopped because it is not accessible then how do they get the figure of 300 tons a day? I believe that figure is from the seawater they are using in a vain attempt to cool the molten uranium.
jtallen83 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 No doubt man has polluted the environment but all this doom and gloom stuff is a little over the top. Brings me back to grade school when they were telling me there would be another ice age by the year 2000. Many of these pollutants they now claim are showing up might be because the technology used to measure them has become more sophisticated. Anyone remember the ozone hole hoax, taught me to be very skeptical. Grandma drove around the last several years of her life in a car without AC because the cost of fixing it had went sky high, to the ozone layer! http://principia-scientific.org/ozone-hole-layer-hoax-dry-run-global-warming/
jtallen83 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, planeflyer21 said: I believe that figure is from the seawater they are using in a vain attempt to cool the molten uranium. That is over 70,000 gallons a day since the accident happen, I'm not buying it. Edited March 4, 2017 by jtallen83 math sucks
planeflyer21 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Posted March 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, jtallen83 said: That is over 70,000 gallons a day since the accident happen, I'm not buying it. The volume? Every USN ship has emergency pumps all over that will do 500 gallons per minute. That's 30,000/gallons per hour. 75,000 gallons per day sounds like an underestimate to me.
jtallen83 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 No doubt they could pump that much but are they? The lack of hard data, details, corroborated facts makes me suspicious.
planeflyer21 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Posted March 4, 2017 The lack of hard data, details, and corroborated facts makes me think "coverup."
jtallen83 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Posted March 4, 2017 18 minutes ago, planeflyer21 said: The lack of hard data, details, and corroborated facts makes me think "coverup." Groups like Greenpeace and Woods Hole do not sound near as doomsday as the video and they would be the ones I would expect to be screaming if there were hard facts to point at. https://news.vice.com/article/five-years-after-the-fukushima-disaster-the-fish-are-proliferating
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now