Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

Load testing different bullets


skeeter

Recommended Posts

DSCN4633.jpg

Going to find out which will shoot best in my new rifle, I have been using 168gr Barnes TSX in my 300 RUM for the last 7 or 8 years with better then half a minute results. However my new polygonal rifled barrel on my .308AR doesnt seem to like the solid coppers very well, so its off the the loading bench to try out a few different bullets. This is going to be alot of fun!  <thumbsup>

For the time being I will only be testing two propellants H4895, and AR-Comp Varget.

Need to get ready for some feral hog eradication  >:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit I have never used varget, but after getting a couple recomendations from you guys I checked it out and seems there is alot of very happy varget users out there. Now I have to go get another pound of powder. Which means I have to load more test rounds, which means I have to send more rounds downrange, and thats just terrible  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Here we go, time to make my fingers hurt. It seems the older I get the more my fingers seem to hurt from working brass.

DSCN4687.jpg

Now that everything is lubed, resized, trimmed, deburred, and chamfered. its time to prime and charge.

[img width=810 height=607]http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh225/Polaris624/DSCN4688.jpg

[img width=810 height=607]http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh225/Polaris624/DSCN4691.jpg

60 rounds 5 of each bullet, with 2 charges of each powder.

42, and 44 gr of H4895, and 43 and 45 of Varget.

[img width=810 height=607]http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh225/Polaris624/DSCN4693.jpg

My little corner of the house, the wife gets the entire house and I get a small corner of the garage.

[img width=810 height=607]http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh225/Polaris624/DSCN4694.jpg

I will post the results next weekend.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Results from the load testing.

These strings were all fired from sand bags on a bench with 6 mph winds and 65 degree temp.

Rifle: DPMS style clone, 20 inch polygonal rifled barrel, .308 cal.

Honady SST 165gr.

43gr Varget, std dev 1.29, mean velocity 2561, extreme spread 3fps, group size .73moa

45gr Varget, std dev 24.72, mean velocity 2728, extreme spread 52fps, group size 1.01moa

42gr H4895, std dev 6.39, mean velocity 2624, extreme spread 15fps, group size 1.11moa

44gr H4895, std dev 4.97, mean velocity 2742, extreme spread 11fps, group size 1.24moa

Nosler Accubond 165gr.

43gr Varget, std dev 11.89, mean velocity 2555, extreme spread 27fps, group size 1.51moa

45gr Varget, std dev 10.87, mean velocity 2689, extreme spread 26fps, group size 1.17moa

42gr H4895, std dev 4.57, mean velocity 2641, extreme spread 10fps, group size 1.67moa

44gr H4895, std dev 4.93, mean velocity 2734, extreme spread 11fps, group size 1.45moa

Sierra Gameking 165gr.

43gr Varget, std dev 2.21, mean velocity 2537, extreme spread 5fps, group size 1.18

45gr Varget, std dev 14.00, mean velocity 2650, extreme spread 33fps, group size 1.71

42gr H4895, std dev 36.20, mean velocity 2619, extreme spread 78fps, group size 2.94

44gr H4896, std dev 7.25, mean velocity 2735, extreme spread 17fps, group size 1.42

                           

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 45 gr varget with the Hornady string would have been about the same or slightly better then the 43gr string if it werent for a round that went low and dropped in velocity so much. There was a Sierra load that went freaky bad too, guess thats the human element in hand loading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like SST , 42-44 grs. stands out , ES is also good , of course the group size, also .

A different COL or different primer , could change the others or another powder . That's the beauty of reloading .

I have been pushing SST 's for a while now . The bullet is just a performer  ,even in other weights.

Nice job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes its clear the sst was the better performer, however I was looking to get better performance then what I'm getting overall.

Am I wrong in expecting a little better accuracy from a semi-auto rifle?

I wonder if a round of Tubbs Final Finish would tighten things up a bit? I have a nib kit I purchased some time back that I never used. Just not sure it will do much for this polygonal rifling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes its clear the sst was the better performer, however I was looking to get better performance then what I'm getting overall.

Am I wrong in expecting a little better accuracy from a semi-auto rifle? yes / no, Are these your first test loads ?

I wonder if a round of Tubbs Final Finish would tighten things up a bit? I have a nib kit I purchased some time back that I never used. Just not sure it will do much for this polygonal rifling. Not sure about the type of rifling , but I have never needed any thing like the Tubbs system or maybe I have & not known it .  If the barrel is a match barrel , it shouldn't need any thing , but shooting .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...