Well, I'm still trying to digest all of that. It still seems like, for the most part, "same old same old" type of debate. You get people from both sides, they make thier points, then nothing comes from it. What really changes? Though I do believe that the debate needs to be had. Brian and Jane, to me, had some really strong, well thought statements for the leftist of this world. The county sheriff from the audience was also spot on with his opinions. The only problem being...is that no matter what people like us think or say to anti-gun people...we'll never, never change thier opinion. It's so engrained into them that ALL guns are evil. Only police and military should have them (which we all know is rediculous). They just don't get it. They never will. They wanna dance around "assault weapons", and "hi-cap" mags. I especially liked it when that ignorant Gail spoke of hi-caps for revolvers. You gotta love how the audience reacted to that. The only half-decent statement made by that guy Cecil, was about learning to shoot as a kid in boyscouts. And the fact that now, he chooses.....I'll say again....chooses not to have a gun. And it's fine, to me, if someone chooses not to own any weapons. But, the moment that they wanna start telling the rest of us what we can, and cannot choose. That's where I'll always have a major problem. And to me, that goes well beyond just weapons. Freedom of choice. Choose to be religious....or not. Choose to own weapons.....or not. Hell, choose to own cars....or not. Choose to (insert hobby or belief here).....or not. Alright....I'm on the verge of really going off on a tangent here. Enough soapbox time.................................for now.