BrianK
Members-
Posts
652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by BrianK
-
This forum is dangerous to my wallet! Right now my 300BLK build MUST wear either a blast forwarder or a can so as not to destroy the carbon fiber forearm. I've been kicking around the idea of building another upper with a short forearm and thereby get a handgun that is 4+" shorter and a bunch lighter. With a folding buffer tube adapter it would be quite small when folded. Right now it's just a sort of "maybe I should do this" sort of thought. I have no idea what I'd use it for but it might be nice to have. I'm almost 70, do I need it? Want is a different matter entirely. If I was younger and more able I'd do it in a heartbeat. To build it to my specs is expensive so I lean toward not building it. Maybe my brother wants something like that. He and I could build it together for him using his check book. He doesn't know it yet but he needs either a 300 BLK or a 300 Ham'r. So far he has successfully resisted my seed planting.
-
I guess I just don't get the way some folks think
BrianK replied to BrianK's topic in General Discussion
Exactly! I've never found one superior cartridge. But there may be a superior cartridge for a given application. The author of the article should have known better IMO. He's not a noob. Maybe I missed something. Highly likely. I seem to remember in many years past a cartridge based on the .223 with the neck opened up to .30. As is it might not feed in a magazine (was it for the Contender?), but shorten the brass and deep seat the bullet and maybe I'm envisioning the 300 Ham'r? Oh well, I don't want it. I don't want a .30 in the AR that uses more powder than the 300BLK. The BLK does exactly what I need it to do. Maybe if we had hogs the 300 Ham'r might attract me, but the .50 Beowulf could be used or even a .308 Win. I'm rambling. -
I know I don't understand the way the left thinks (pure evil). But this is not that. It involves 300BLK vs 300Ham'r vs .308 Win. There is a review of the Wilson 300 Ham'r in the latest Firearms News and In it the author basically states that the 300Ham'r is superior to the 300 BLK and if it had come out forst the 300BLK would be nonexistent today. He bases it only on velocity and ft/lbs. Heck, going by that POF makes an Ar15 in .308 Win that will wi[e the floor with the Ham'r. I built my 300BLK because it could do a credible job at supersonic and still do subsonic. The author admits the Ham'r doesn't do subsonic well. I'm at a loss to understand the superiority of the Ham'r if it doesn't do subsonic. It clearly wouldn't work for me. Or should I go back to my prepubescents days when I compared cartridges based on ft/lbs and velocity with little understanding of anything else? Like what they can be used for? I hope I'm explaining myself adequately. I don't think I'm a fan boy for anything, but I see what will work for me and select the cartridge based on what it will do. Heck, I even use cartridges from the late 1800s because they do what I want. I think the author of the article is full of crap. But I don't doubt that the 300 Ham'r is right for the use some folks will put it to. But superior? So how does it do subsonic? And does it just sip powder to do what it does? That was another reason I liked 300BLK, it uses little powder to get 'er done.
-
You guys who like to shoot .22 and might be bored
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
That is slicker than snot! I was laughing my ass off for the first few seconds. Would I want one, sure, I'd take one if it was given to me. I wouldn't want to pay for it or feed it. -
You guys who like to shoot .22 and might be bored
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
I'm shooting .22 from the '70s and yes, it works great, llke the day I bought it. -
What do you have on order or in the mail? Part 2
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
We make very little in this country anymore. What a shame. We finance our enemies military build up to defeat us. PETA types... Yeah, they'd rather but the meat grown in plastic rather than get the stuff harvested by themselves. Of course I jest, but that was in an irate letter to the editor many years ago by a moron. Of course a deer will run off as it bleeds out. With what I think could be coming you just might skewer one in your backyard. -
Welcome to the forum. I can't help you but as you've already seen, others can and will help.
-
What do you have on order or in the mail? Part 2
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
Soon after getting the Exomag and while waiting for Maine to open up xbow season I joined an archery club to make use of their wooded field course. It was super easy. The velocity of the xbow meant minimal trajectory compensation. I don't remember anything that wouldn't have been a kill shot. It was super simple to make the shots. Ranges were typical vertical bow range. Some folks think they have firing distance like a firearm and they don't. One shot, that's it within typical bow range, so make it good. They are slow to load and ungainly in the forest. When one lets the limbs go forward there had better not be something in the way or you have a broken collar bone. -
What do you have on order or in the mail? Part 2
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
I think the accuracy is a characteristic for Excalibur. I have the Exomag and have had it for decades. When I demoed it for a vertical bow user and he nearly soiled his undies due to how good I was with it immediately. Need to be careful and pick a different spot on the target so as not to split a shaft. I ordered a mess of strings and have yet to replace the first after many hundreds of shots. I've heard of some xbows that need a new string after much fewer shots. I bought mine to take advantage of the (at the time) proposed xbow season. Then Maine put us in with firearms and not bow season, so I gave up the idea of using it and stayed with a firearm. Now decades later I can't hunt at all. MtnMike, one thing to be aware of with a crossbow is that the shaft may come out the far side of a deer and still have dangerous velocity. You mentioned a HOA and to me that means people being around. YIKES! Just something to consider. -
What do you have on order or in the mail? Part 2
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
Minor part... Just ordered a H&K style 3 lug adapter for the new barrel when it arrives. -
Well said, good thread. Even in peacetime we lose soldiers and lots of folks don't realize that. I was on hazardous duty, yet never served in a combat zone, and we lost soldiers. I was once snidely asked by a coworker why I never took part in a public display for Memorial Day. He didn't get it and I told him that for me every day is Memorial Day. How does one escape the folks one knew who are now dead?
-
Yes, they are loud. I have an Excalibur also and my neighbor 100 yards away can hear it when I shoot. But they're not as loud as a firearm. The first time I shot it at a friends house I thought he was going to poop himself. He shoots a vertical bow and he couldn't believe the accuracy. Me? I didn't know it was something exceptional. Buy I soon learned to put the arrow where I wanted it and not to shoot a group or I could split an arrow.
-
Yes. I wonder what goes through the minds of folks who think they're going to hit the road with nowhere to go and the fuel pumps also not working. I happen to be rural and will just hunker down, can't do anything else, but even when I was more able that was my plan. 100% correct, no aerial resupply for anyone but maybe the folks who could be the enemy. I put nothing beyond our go'vermin and what they would do. If I was still able and had to go cross country it would be on foot or by ATV trails and I'd bring my 5# AR and a bunch of ammo for it. I'd also be the unseen mouse and try not to engage anyone. Basically the same rules for no engagements when carrying today as a concealed carrier. One wins every engagement that is dodged. I would definitely NOT be looking for trouble. I also won't be looking for trouble when hunkered down at the homestead. But won't shy away from it if it's a serious issue. It depends on circumstances. I'll help good folks if I'm able.
-
It appears there are lots of old SOBs on this forum. Glad to make your acquaintances and to be another. I know my land and they don't. Shots are short, it's heavily wooded Maine and I practice that as often as possible in USPSA competition and was trained in Quick Kill (just google it). I have no possibility of surviving long term but I'll give it hell!
-
Like Magwa my warrior days are over. I'm going nowhere. So I'll grab the suppressed 300BLK handgun I recently built and hunker down. At least that's my plan now and in fact as I write it's next to the bed 15' away. Like everything though it's subject to change.
-
Any experience with Caldwell AR15 Magloader
BrianK replied to MJV83's topic in Cleaning ,Maintenance and Tools
Sorry, I can't get a link because Windows has hijacked my computer for an update and when that happens the kindergarten programmers that do the updates think my computer belongs to them. I hate Windows! Basically my computer has been down for 24 hours. Back now. I still hate Windows! I've been using the ETS magloader for rifle mags for years of competition. I can load a days worth of mags, 30 rounders in minutes. I've used it for 9mm, 300BLK, and 5.56. Like most loaders (not all) the rounds need to be in boxes with the base up. No specific box though. My boxes are Dillon, but since I case gauge all of my 9mm ammo 100 at a time with the appropriate case gauge (shockbottle) it's no big deal to put them in the boxes. It goes really fast. It also works with factory ammo boxes. The Maglula pictured above works really great too for 5.56 and 300BLK, is much smaller, is less frail, and doesn't require special boxing. It's not as fast as the ETS, but I always have it in my range bag. Maglula makes really good stuff! Love their 10/22 loader/unloader too! ETS also makes a loader for handgun mags but I never got mine to work and no longer have it. I gave it away to someone who also couldn't get it to work. I was loading 9mm M&P mags, he was loading 9mm Glock mags. -
What do you have on order or in the mail? Part 2
BrianK replied to imschur's topic in General Discussion
Be advised, not AR10. Ordered a Volquartsen carbon fiber barrel and fore-end for my 10/22 Charger SBR today. The accuracy of the finished SBR was depressing. It wasn't horrible, but for me only accurate guns are interesting and I didn't consider it accurate. My build met the goal I had for it, the smallest rifle I could build. But better accuracy would have been nice. I do use it for Steel Challenge and it's great for that. Hopefully this barrel with pic' rail attached to the barrel will do what I want. I'll know in 3-6 weeks since everyone is out of stock. I'll need to attach a 3 lug quick attach adapter (HK?) then it's done. Anyway, it's a standard 3 lug adapter whatever it's called. I might even have a spare in parts. I need to check. Initially I wasn't going to order the new barrel due to the $. But someone convinced me. I want to be happy with what I built. Yes, it'll make the take down SBR quite a bit larger (longer) when in pieces. See far below. The pistol grip folds today, that's an old picture. https://www.opticsplanet.com/volquartsen-firearms-lightweight-threaded-rifle-barrel-and-forend-ruger-22-charg.html -
Congrats on a good build! FWIW, the lens does make the barrel seem REALLY long, but that's photography.
-
I think you'll like it Sisco (from what I've read about it). It's basically the HP v 2.0 with everything fixed that folks paid big bux to get fixed in years past. I wish mine didn't bite me. But I'll lose too much $ to sell mine, buy new, and start all over again. The things that were wrong with the HP doomed it to newer designs and Browning didn't make changes. SA did, and if you're going to make a "new" handgun why not fix it from the get go? Back slaps to SA! If you get one let us know how you like it. IMO the HP has the best ergonomics of any handgun ever made. I'd like to know if SA perfected it.
-
The info I have on the SA HP is that it's superior (out of the box) to the original. No mag safety to remove, reduced or totally missing hammer bite, I wish I had one but I'm not going to sell my HP from '73 to get one. I had lots of work done to mine, sights, trigger, NP3 coating, Bar-Sto barrel. Mine hasn't had a mag safety for decades. If I was thinking of a HP today it would be the SA version w/o a doubt. That would also put some time between acquisitions.
-
Not out of an AR10, but out of a .308 Encore handgun I shot 55grain bullets with a sabot. I doubt they would feed in a semi-auto. The powder was extremely fast for .308 and blast was incredible. Powder was nothing anyone would ever use in a normal .308/7.62. I remember 3600 fps. Accuracy was "mehh", memory tells me 3" @ 100 yards. For me that's not very good. I discussed it with the sabot manufacturer and he told me that was all I could expect. End of project. Is it Speer that made (still makes?) 100 grain "plinkers". I've shot those out of a bolt action, I didn't have a chronograph at the time so don't know the velocity. As already mentioned light bullets are a short range affair or mortar them in. I did contact Speer to ask about max' velocity for the bullet and was told "as fast as you can drive them". The jacket was a barely formed cup and super thick.
-
😀 I have an uncle in Toms River. You folks definitely are fighting the current! I told my family that they're absolutely welcome to come up, but bye, bye, we're gone, you're not holding me in NJ! They see what I have and what I can buy in the LGS and they have open jaws. They can't believe what freedom actually means.









