98Z5V

They're already trying that - first, they have to limit the ammo, and they keep trying, through magazine limitations. They tried the "armor piercing" thing and tried to take M855, and THAT backfired in their face kinda quicklike. Outside of the 10-rd limit states (all the blue ones), I think CO is the only other one that got hit, with 15rds, on mag restrictions. CO got that only from all the granola-head motherfuckers that leaked into there from Cali. "Ooooh, Boulder, and Durango..." I think they even took the mags before they got the legal pot! What your wife speaks is the truth - they want the operational parts, first. Just like the British, in late 1774, seizing powder stores. It wasn't about "taxation." That was an annoyance, but not the problem. The British tried to seize their last powder stores here on 19 April, 1775, and the shiit truly hit the fan on THAT day. No more. No more powder shall ye take, not today, and not ever...

I have my faith in ME, brother. I know how to train a "perimeter defense," too, and I've got the hardware to do it. When the time comes, and the shiit really hits the fan, I know I'll have the people to do it. In droves. Rule #1 - you NEED to know the FPL. I will handle TRP1.

Let those bastards get bright red before you pull them, and try them out...

I'm down. Get to my house. I'll send you the address. I can defend the whole block, neighborhood, maybe the whole southeastern section of town. If we can make the lines-of-communication and lines-of-defense to my gun pushers house, we control the entire southern portion of the town, completely, between he and I. Just get here...

Nice deflection, but... You and I are not 84 years old. Every suppressor in our adult life IS Tax Stamped. So, withstanding your valiant attempt at deflecting the damned question... when was the last time someone with ANY Tax Stamped item had it just fucking plainass confiscated?... "Never," is the answer to that question, brother, and you know it.

How light of a projectile are you reloading? It's gotta be light (as hell), from a .30 cal, to run some Reloder 10.

Just name the last case that a Tax Stamped suppressor was taken from a law abiding citizen... for an unpaid parking ticket... I'm cool with it, whenever it happened. It just never, ever happened. Ever.

Hotwrench - quit being a little bitch, and crying to the administration of this board, trying to get me censored. Just be a fucking man about it, and come back in here and talk the same shiit you were talking before, when you thought your internet balls were so huge before... You're a giant candyass... What a waste... You were tough before, and had alot to say. Now, all you can say is the complaints to board admin, wanting me "censored..." Sure shows where YOU are, Hotwrench...

Swear we've been through this before... The LAST guy that lost his Tax-Stamped Suppressor because he had an unpaid parking ticket was... Never. It's never happened.

By the way, Hotwrench, I already heard that you were whining and crying to Mods and Admins... before I ever posted that last one. Grow the fuk up and fight your own fights, you candyass POS...

Who the fuk are YOU to come out of nowhere, and challenge what I said? I don't have to "think anything over" that I've said. I said it, and it's fucking done. I don't look back at my comments, based on WHY I make my comments in the first fucking place. You, even thinking that I need to contemplate something like that makes you a fucking nothing. I don't walk back anything that I say. Ever. Shows me where you stand, right there. Nothing about ANY full auto was ever mentioned - but YOU had to throw it in. Because reading comprehension kicks your a$s. You can't even comprehend that the "laws" in talking about have already been in effect for every single Tax Stamp device since 1934, and those laws haven't changed. Not once. The "procedure" is going down not, today, exactly as it has in the past, with zero deviation. However, "your range toys" aren't that important to you, so fuk other gun owners that have a real need for hearing protection, and suppressors... Nope, you drew my fire because you're a fucking idiot, plain and simple. That's all that did it. To further compound my guess that you were a fucking idiot, you feel the need to "link" me something to a "pocket constitution." Motherfucker, I solemnly swore to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I would bear true faith and allegiance to the same - for more than two fucking decades of my adult life. Any YOU think that YOU can challenge me on that? You're a giant piece of shiit, if you think that you're better than me, and think you've accomplished more than I have. That just leaves you in the hole that you're in, though - thinking you are something. When you're nothing. YOU better yank out that pocket constitution, and find out what went wrong with you. I defended my country, proudly, in uniform, for two decades. Lemme know how you did, fuckhead. Comes from another fucking STUPID comment you made here, where you said I was an "unknown." You stupid fuk, I'm QUITE KNOWN here... but it tells me where YOU stand... I'm not the one pounding sand, here, fukchops. That'll be... you. tried to tell you not to make this personal, but you couldn't help yourself. You just HAD to keep going. Told you again,about the personal attacks, and you defended it, calling it "local" or something. This really was the last one, with you, fuckhead. Here, on this board, I can tell you this. I've had enough of your shiit. I've tolerated enough - that you thought you could just get away with. I can guarantee you this right here - everytime you make a comment, I'll be there to wreck it. Everytime. It's not like you came here to help anybody, though, and you're providing any kind of help to anybody with gun issues. You are here for you. And when you are, I'll be right here to kick you straight in your balls... Guarantee that, motherfucker. That is YOU, and I'm here to end it. I will end you, here... No, you still take it. You're on top, of being the asshead with the comments, and zero contribution. I will fix you. Instead of running your cockholster all the time, maybe you should have stuck around and LISTENED sometime...

There you go again. I'm about to get into your ass like you've never been seen before... You've made your last fucked up comment towards me, that I'm gonna take. You think you've had a free pass, to this point, because I haven't said anything. You, literally, are a nobody. You are a blowhard, that only wants to stir shiit, and you don't know what you're talking about. You're about to get a dose of me that you won't like. This is your last warning.

This? That you posted?... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act Show me the change, or amendment, that was listed in that link?... There aren't any.

I hope he's gone. For good...

I completely understand those words, in entirety. List the links to the changes to the NFA 1934... Cite sources. The NFA 1934 has never been amended, or changed. Prove me wrong.

Read it the way it was written, look at the information- and that's the exact way it as written. It's now up to US - COLLECTIVELY - to either champion that idea, or just sit here jacking off and say, "That's WAY too hard, man... no way... so why try?..." Looks like you don't like it, and you're in the "why try" camp on this. That idea is the best fucking thing that's come along in decades - yes, like twenty-plus years- and everybody is sitting around yanking dick, and saying, "Cant happen, so why try..." It's pathetic...

I[m not nitpicking, at all. I never gave any stats. That's all YOU, brother. All you. You came up with the figure, not me, and said it was small - with zero data to back anything up. Not even ONE number...

I don't care where that article came from- it's a pretty fucking good idea. It's something worth looking into, and a damn great proposal, no matter what the tin-foil reason for rejecting it is...

I'm not on the same list that YOU are, right now, Jim... They gonna get you before they get me?...

My point that I just made, in the last post I made, prior to yours. YOU are on a list, brother. YOU are. Think you're not? Are they coming for you, yet? Are they coming for you in the future?...

The article you question - and condemn- specifically stated that the "license" was just that - like a driver's license. You don't state what you bought, you don't HAVE to state what you bought, and nobody has any IDEA what you bought - just that you had to have the license to buy certain things. Zero tracking, zero paperwork, zero...ANYTHING... other than "YOU HAVE THE LICENSE TO BUY THIS OR NOT?..." Got the license? Good - you're good. Give me your money, I verified your license, have a good day. Here's your item that you paid for." You guys didn't even read the fucking article - and if you did, your blinders are so fucking thick that you can't even comprehend what was stated in the article... This is unreal... You wanna talk about "registering yourself..." How many Tax Stamp people, since 1934, have been gone after and had their shiit confiscated? Got any numbers, or even a story about it?... Brother, let me tell you, right now. YOU are already REGISTERED. Everywhere. Doesn't have shiit to do with any guns, either. YOU area already marked...

84 years ago. You're saying that the number of SBR owners, the number of suppressor owners, the number of legal SBS owners, and the number of AOW owners is small. You have a number of the people that own all that stuff? You have any proof whatsoever than the 1934 NFA has ever been changed? Instead of deflecting again, just answer the question. When was the 1934 NFA changed?... When was it changed?... It never, ever was. That's the answer. Since you brought it up, please give me the numbers on the percentage of firearms owners with NFA items is small. You apparently have the numbers on all american gun owners, how many guns they have, and also have the data on how many NFA-item owners that are out there, by NFA-item count, so spill the beans already... Or, just say that it's conjecture on your part - and you have no data on your statement... You're just "guessing" here...

There is ZERO registration talk in the other thread. None. Well, aside from the people that mistakenly "thought" it was about registration, jumped to that conclusion, and didn't even read it. Those that didn't even read it, but only took pieces of it, said it was registration. Clueless. Refuse to be educated. Shout the anti and move on, they do. That article was directly NOT registration. And here we are - arguing that mythical beast again. This whole thing is just shiit-talking after shiit-talking. Nobody will bear down and actually muscle through an article and READ IT. And, here we are. You just proved it again, brother. Big time. There IS no "registration nonsense" in the other thread - because it's directly non-registration, completely. Let's just Nancy Pelosi this some more, and just keep going here...

True, or am I lying?...