planeflyer21 Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 Jon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unforgiven Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 :wtf: :rant2: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigP623 Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 Seriously the company that makes these need to be burned and all employees be burned at the stake....I mean seriously what right minded person would even shoot at these targets anyways...fuckin sick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StainTrain Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 No kidding. Bring back the shoot/no shoot targets with the 70s pornstar mustaches and mullets. Yes, I'm serious. I love those targets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 It's all about training - you'd hate to hear about a group of GIs in Afghaniland that had a woman walk up, asking for help, only to find out that she ambushed them and killed them all when she whipped out an AK from under her burkha...Know your threat, and keep emotions out of it.Looks like DHS is preparing for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StainTrain Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 An overfunded Department desperately seeking a mission.I do agree with you on training and the targets. I suspect we shot at some of the same targets in "recent" years. However there was nothing quite as distracting as a Ned Flanders mustache. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 However there was nothing quite as distracting as a Ned Flanders mustache. <laughs> <lmao> I had an old First Sergeant that I called Ned Flanders, BECAUSE of his moustache... ;D Never to his face, though... :-[Interestingly enough, in those target pics above... there wer only TWO innocent. The rest were threats. The baby in the pregnant woman's belly - that's one non-threat there. What a fucked up situation... :o The miniature girl on the playground, with the older sister, gun-wielding psycho... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DNP Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 You mean the ninja? You can't say she's not a threat. Guilty by association if nothing else. <dontknow> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikedaddyH Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 I bet there would be some Very Pissed Off people if someone printed a bunch of posters with DHS soldiers with a target on the head. How about a tag line thats says , " Torso shots dont count, body armor stops your shots !" The other poster would be a UN soldier dressed in blue , busting thur your front door.We need to be prepared ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planeflyer21 Posted February 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 I have a buttload of TQ targets from Law Enforcement Targets, from when AZ mandated certain types for CCW quals...hundreds left.$2,000,000 is a LOT of training targets! Jon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepp Posted February 26, 2013 Report Share Posted February 26, 2013 I have a buttload of TQ targets from Law Enforcement Targets, from when AZ mandated certain types for CCW quals...hundreds left.$2,000,000 is a LOT of training targets! Jon Hell yea it is, I was getting silhouettes off line for 20$ a 100. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.