survivalshop

Oh , no brass deflector or Forward assist , I think DPMS made some of those like that also also , not sure they still do .

Gray area , if he is only helping with this one , but its his call , because he is doing the work for you or if he did it for himself & didn't like it & gave it to you . ATF Changes Definition of “Manufacturer” Posted by johnjacobh on August 17, 2008 From the administration of the “Vote Freedom First” President George W. Bush, the ATF launches another breathtaking power grab. New Link to replace dead link: “http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/manufacturers.html”> Complete Link: http://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearmstech/081508manufacturing-of-firearms.pdf Text of File: U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Firearms Technology Branch August 15, 2008 Martinsburg, West Virginia 25405 http://www.atf.gov Manufacturing of Firearms Below are examples of operations performed on firearms and guidance as to whether or not such operations would be considered manufacturing under the Gun Control Act (GCA). These examples do not address the question of whether the operations are considered manufacturing for purposes of determining excise tax. Any questions concerning the payment of excise tax should be directed to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Generally, a person should obtain a license as a manufacturer of firearms if the person: 1) is performing operations that create firearms or alter firearms (in the case of alterations, the work is not being performed at the request of customers, rather the person who is altering the firearms is purchasing them making the changes, and then reselling them); 2) is performing the operations as a regular course of business or trade; and 3) is performing the operations for the purpose of sale or distribution of the firearms. 1. A company produces a quantity of firearm frames or receivers for sale to customers who will assemble firearms. The company is engaged in the business of manufacturing firearms and should be licensed as a manufacturer of firearms. 2. A company produces frames or receivers for another company that assembles and sells the firearms. Both companies are engaged in the business of manufacturing firearms, and each should be licensed as a manufacturer of firearms. 3. A company provides frames to a subcontractor company that performs machining operations on the frames and returns the frames to the original company that assembles and sells the completed firearms. Both companies are engaged in the business of manufacturing firearms and should be licensed as manufacturers of firearms. 4. A company produces barrels for firearms and sells the barrels to another company that assembles and sells complete firearms. Because barrels are not firearms, the company that manufactures the barrels is not a manufacturer of firearms. The company that assembles and sells the firearms should be licensed as a manufacturer of firearms. 5. A company receives firearm frames from individual customers, attaches stocks and barrels, and returns the firearms to the customers for the customers’ personal use. The operations performed on the firearms were not for the purpose of sale or distribution. The company should be licensed as a dealer or gunsmith, not as a manufacturer of firearms. 6. A company acquires one receiver, assembles one firearm, and sells the firearm. The company is not manufacturing firearms as a regular course of trade or business and is not engaged in the business of manufacturing firearms. This company does not need to be licensed as a manufacturer. 7. An individual acquires frames or receivers and assembles firearms for his or her personal use, not for sale or distribution. The individual is not manufacturing firearms for sale or distribution and is not required to be a licensed manufacturer. 8. A gunsmith regularly buys military-type firearms, Mausers, etc., and sporterizes” them for resale. The gunsmith is in the business of manufacturing firearms and should be licensed as a manufacturer. 9. A gunsmith buys semiautomatic pistols and modifies the slides to accept a new style of sights. The sights are not usually sold with these firearms and do not attach to the existing mounting openings. The gunsmith offers these firearms for sale. This would be considered the manufacturing of firearms, and the gunsmith should be licensed as a manufacturer. 10. A gunsmith buys government model pistols and installs “drop-in” precision trigger parts or other “drop-in parts” for the purpose of resale. This would be considered the manufacturing of firearms, as the gunsmith is purchasing the firearms, modifying the firearms, and selling them. The gunsmith should be licensed as a manufacturer. 11. A gunsmith buys surplus military rifles, bends the bolts to accept a scope, and then drills the receivers for a scope base. The gunsmith offers these firearms for sale. This would be considered the manufacturing of firearms, and the gunsmith should be licensed as a manufacturer. 12. A gunsmith buys surplus military rifles or pistols and removes the stocks, adds new stocks or pistol grips, cleans the firearms, then sends the firearms to a separate contractor for bluing. These firearms are then sold to the public. This would be considered manufacturing of firearms, and the gunsmith should be licensed as a manufacturer. 13. A company purchases surplus firearms, cleans the firearms, then offers them for sale to the public. The company does not need to be licensed as a manufacturer. 14. A company produces firearms or firearm receivers and sends the firearm/receivers out for colorizing (bluing, camouflaging, phosphating, or plating) and/or heat treating. Do the companies performing the colorization and/or heat treating need to be licensed as manufacturers, and are the companies required to place their markings on the firearm? ATF has determined that both colorization and heat treating of firearms are manufacturing processes. The companies performing the processes are required to be licensed as manufacturers. If the companies providing colorization and/or heat treating have not received variances to adopt the original manufacturer’s markings, they would be required to place their own markings on any firearm on which they perform the manufacturing process of colorization and/or heat treating. About these ads

Pilot deserves a Medal !

I didn't see anything but a photo of him when I pulled it up , but thats not an SKS or a ACOG !

Ya , some kind of Mechanical rm. , one way in , one way out . I can't tell if there is a rifle in that mess or not , I see what looks like some part of a rifle , but can't decipher as of yet . The sparks could also be from some of the early 7.62x39 that had the steel core , a steel jacket would also do it , as said . He used that ammo for a reason , though that caliber would have defeated most soft body armor that is worn by LE , any way .

The AR 10 ( Armalite ) Carbine system uses a longer Receiver Extension , if you want to use an AR 10 system , you will have to change your stock , because yours is proprietary to the Receiver Extension ( Buffer Tube ). JP's spring is OK as long as you use a DPMS type 308LR Buffer . Which is 2.5 " long , Heavy Buffers Spring for the DPMS system is OK also , as long as you use his or a DPMS Buffer . Compliments of HEAVY BUFFERS.

Agruement on Facebook led to they https://www.yahoo.com/news/fatal-police-shooting-black-lives-000000007.html

The sparks intrigue me , I first thought it was incoming tracers , but watch the Video I posted & they seem to follow the shooters aiming pants . I know they make steel jacketed 7.62x 39 ( among other calibers ), but never shot it at reinforced concrete . Kinda dangerous . http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/dallas-police-gunman-shooting-cop-officer-victim-video-kdfw-graphic-opening-fire-twitter-youtube/

Why that Patrol car , might I ask ?

Going to assume you have a Carbine Stock set up , because of the Change out to Mil Spec , how long is the Buffer & its weight , how long is the Buffer Spring & how many coils ? What is the depth of the Receiver Extension ( buffer tube ) ?

I've seen some say the weapon used in Dallas shootings was a SKS , but can't find anything to back that info up , why is there nothing about what he used , wait , could it be it wasn't one of the know massacre rifles we hear so much about ? The libtards should be all over this if it was , just strange I con't find a reference to it . I've dialed in on the video , but can't tell , one thing I did notice is the sparks from his projectiles hitting the cement around the LEO he shot in the back . Steel Jacket ?

You have to use 308 components , H2 is for a AR 15. Like these below . Heavy Buffers & his systems have good reviews also & have advertising on this sight . http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/recoil-parts/recoil-buffers/buffers-prod42991.aspx?avs%7cMake_3=AR+xzzx308 http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/recoil-parts/recoil-springs/index.htm?avs%7CMake_3=AR%20xzzx308

Anything that comes out of the ' True Believer " is pure BS , his lips move, but nothing but $hit ones out , the stench is overwhelming , he has stirred this up since that Beer Summit ,in his first year in office , which was more BS , because he was wrong to condemn the LEO for doing his job .

Use DPMS 308 type Carbine components in that stock , I would measure the inside depth to make sure what it is . We have seen many Proprietary Manufactured Components that will not function correctly with std Buffer systems , like DPMS or AR 10 . Measuring the inside depth will tell you a lot about what will work best, the DPMS type system is the same as an AR 15 , around 7" deep . I'm not too impressed with that stock , it has a very small attachment point for the Stock assembly its self , a weak point , but ya never know , we expect a review of its performance https://xlrindustries.com/products/tactical-butt-stock

I have one on a DPMS Lower & works real well , mates up like it was made for it ,the Pivot & Disassembly pins come with it , the DPMS pins from my Lower would not work in their Upper , tight fit . They are about an hour & a half away from me , I go there to pick stuff up when they have it ,Convenient .

This all is the propaganda campaign to demonize LE to control them & Its working. Too bad the people who are suffering are the Blacks , but the Commie's don't care , what's a couple thousand dead innocents, the end justifies the means , Sal Alenski would be proud . Another thing I was thinking about , with all those LEO's down town , what was left open , with no LE coverage , it could have been a test , to test response , for a diversion for another crime .

You really can't go wrong with both of them . Thats an idea , build one of each & then you can compare for your next build .

Tactical machining , $ 199.00 , in stock

When you install the HG adaptor , slide the HG on /w the Rail mounted on it ( if you are using a top rail ) & see how the two rails line up . The rail screw holes are elongated for forward & backward movement to seat the rails flush with one another . I have a tool for it so when I do mine , I just leave the alignment tool in place till the Loctite sets up . You can use a Scope ring for an alignment tool to bridge the gap between the two rails or do it by eye , your choice.

We have seen issues with PA 10 builds , but you should have no issues with a DPMS type Barrel & BCG . Is your Barrel Nut threads on the Upper receiver DPMS or Armalite ? I think most issues were with their Buffer system . I think when switching to a Armalite AR 10 Buffer system , things worked . There are some threads in here about the issues , most were Tolerance stacking because of mixing Upper & Lower Receivers also , but since you have their set , should be OK Use Quality components & you should be OK , The Barrel Manufactures you mentioned are fine , I use Criterion , myself , but Faxon FireArms is another , Mega also .

Thats the type MechArmor is in the process of acquiring , just waiting for them to get it together if he has enough interest .

Well we did a 180 as far as the M16/M4 is concerned & I for one think its a good thing mostly . Those who remember the " Mad Minute " this will bring back memories . Its all about fire control . http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21739/us-army-m4-carbine-m4a1/

Well where's the new product we were talking about ? Is in the pipe yet ? Seems like we Better hurry .

The Red Loctite should be used & if need to be removed , light heating with a torch will loosen it quite easily ( after removing the Barrel Nut & Barrel ) . I had to use a rod to tighten the one I used on the NP 3 coated POF Upper , like I said , nothing would adhere to it , the nut you are referring to is the Handguard Adaptor , not the barrel Nut . The Adaptor is set to align the HandGuard to its proper orientation , once its set up , I would still use a Rod ( I used an old Die Stem from an RCBS rifle Sizing Die ) it needs to be strong , none bendable , inserted from the inside of the upper Receiver , to make sure it doesn't move , so as to keep the Gas tube passage in alignment . After the Adaptor is set , the Barrel is inserted into the Adaptor & then the Barrel nut with some mil spec grease on its threads & tighten the same as you would normally , snug three times & torque down on the third to align the Gas Tube passage if need be . They said once on their sight that through their testing with rapid fire situations , that if the Hand Guard Adaptor was seated tight against the Upper Receiver , accuracy suffered .

Might have some info & traffic on this section on this sight . https://forum.308ar.com/forum/84-class-iii/