Matt.Cross

Welcome to the forum, we're glad to have you!

She's bad about giving the cold shoulder.... .... 'cause she's a cold, frigid b*tch, with enormous balls.

I never bought into the heavy buffer shmoo until the one Clint sent me kept me from losing track of the bullet trace on the MA TEN in the optic, and now I'm a believer....

I've heard some good reports and seen some really impressive groups out of both of those guns. I was duly impressed...

Awww man, check that sexy beast out! That Mk12 doesn't look too bad either....

@98Z5V has probably lost count of the number of PSA PA-10s he's personally made run like a sewing machine, and that's just the ones we know about. You ought to see the stats on unregistered visitors to his threads on fixing their issues, there are a lot more fixed guns that's he'll never be appropriately credited for than just what meets the eye. Thank you for dropping a thank-you note where it's due, I wish more folks were doing that.

Fixed that for you, DEWS hides from noone. Well, except for blueberry...

Who doesn't love a nice set of large turrets? I'm definitely turned on by them...

The sad truth is, that wouldn't be the ugliest dog he ever smashed... Just sayin'!

The Timney Calvin Elite is probably your best bet then. It so happens that the Geiselle NM is adjustable, but it's a two-stage trigger no matter how adjustable. https://timneytriggers.com/ar-calvin-elite-single-stage-drop-in/

I've got the Geiselle National Match built into several of my rifles now, they are difficult to surpass.

Hi. 🙂

No!

I noticed a distinct lack of ball-busting and chest thumping over running MOA optics this year at the Fall Shoot.... As it turns out, @Moon Boots also happens to utilize MOA optics. Coincidence? Of course, who am I kidding.... It has to be!

Okay, gotcha, thanks for clarifying. I don't like jumping to conclusions, if I don't understand the argument I'll say so and spare myself the embarrassment of assuming. I don't know that the shooter didn't call LEO, I saw nothing to suggest that he had or had not, so that's a moot point for me. I'm not with you on the shooter leaving, the shooter was on his property the whole time, had no obligation or duty to leave, especially with an aggressive bozo getting nasty with the spouse. It might be what some folks would do, but it's not what I would do. Coming back with a gun after said bozo has been asked to leave and is now trespassing and getting nasty with the spouse? You can wait until he snaps her neck if you want... Me, I'd have just gone and gotten the gun, like the guy who is still alive did. As an aside, asking the aggressor to leave satisfies any obligation to attempt to de-escalate the situation. As for whether or not he was looking to kill the guy, I won't pretend to know his motives, but I have to admit that there's plenty of justification for what he did that meets the standards of the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt.

We used to be able to add pics via the 'edit' feature, is that not working anymore?

I'm confused, do you mean the shooter didn't call LEO, or the aggressor didn't call LEO? Or both, and is that something you know, or conjecture? Did the shooter know exactly what he himself (shooter) was looking for, or are you saying the shooter knew what the aggressor was looking for? I'm not being facetious with you, as you're a new member and I don't know you well enough to mistreat you (yet), but it's 2am where I am and apart from saying the shooter should go to jail, your meaning is otherwise unclear. Oh, and welcome to the forums!

LOL I didn't want to say it, but that's the actual very 1st thing I thought about,

I'd call that a safe bet, it works by my math.

#1. Dude was asked to leave the property, should've been over right there and then. #2. Shooter has the right to be armed under any circumstances on his own property, whether or not there's a situation that could escalate. #3. Shooter is armed and threat turns aggressor, in what world would we not consider it basic logic that if I'm clearly armed and you decide to try to assault me anyways that you're clearly a deadly threat because you're ignoring or trying to supersede a deadly defense. I can see where an argument might be made for the first shot into the ground, but it's not a compelling argument. Also, I'm not inclined to defend a 'warning shot' because I don't believe in using them. Considering those three facts along with the potential threat to the aggressor's ex, I'd call it justified. The moral of this story is that trespassing is the wrong hill to die on when you're trying to settle a custody dispute. Get off my property needs to mean something.

The relish is always the kicker ingredient, I usually make a few with no relish for @blue109 at the shoots.

I'm not really sure he was actually drunk, he might've just been overwhelmingly fatigued by trying to get drunk on MGD....