98Z5V

OP, update?...

^^^ That kinda settles the question about handling recoil, right there. Nice rigs! <thumbsup>

VERY well played, Rob!!! :banana: :yup: :hail: :hethan:

I as just coming in here to add that - good lookin' out, Rob. <thumbsup> Owl, seems like 600 is the max distance for your objective. If you were to fab up a shorter version of the M110, that would fill all the roles you've listed. 12~18 mile training movements? I've never, ever done an infil from that far away from the target. If you're training with those distances in order to make the shorter distances easier, then I get it. If you have to make a movement that far just to get to your target, then something is wrong with the planning. Just the water consumption required for a movement that far - that $hit is heavy, at 8lbs per gallon. That's not weight that you want to add to your mission.

It hasn't worked yet - or it's only worked once. If you've shot that combo, take a look at the shoulders on the BCG, where they slammed into the back of your lower receiver, and gouged it up. Seems like you're concerned about putting the correct weight buffer in there, but what you're missing is the correct length of buffer. Yeah, a 5.56 rifle buffer would be too long, and cause it to short stroke. You need to be using 308 AR buffer parts, not 5.56 buffer parts - that includes the spring. If you're using 308 AR parts, please be specific and state that. Your info will only confuse others later, and lead them to believe that you can mix/match that stuff between AR15s and 308ARs - which is definitely, certainly, not the case. That's the science that works. Put your videos up. <thumbsup>

No, that won't function fine. Sounds like he's using the AR-15 H3 buffer. Not gonna work. Well, it'll go bang the first time...

I sure hope you're talking about the Beach Boys, and not Katy Perry... <lmao> He listens to Katy Perry... <lmao>

Bull$hit, that's not the "concensus." I like it that you think you speak for the members of this board, though. Not the fucking case. You seem to think that because you carry concealed, you have a responsibility to other people in danger, and I can point your words out to you, if you don't remember. You're being heavily criticized due to the way that you're dragging this on. You never "wondered" whether the armed might havae a reason for protecting the unarmed, at all. You straight called "people that don't carry" out on some bull$hit notion that you have somehow implanted into your brainpan. Oh, and how many people in a crowd are you effectively gonna protect with a .22LR semi-auto, anyway? You better get your a$s pretty close to the action, superhero. Exactly - every state is different. Tossing blanket statements and generalities about based on your flawed, misguided opinion, covering people in other states with your comments, only shows your ignorance. Thank you beach and Jon, for providing examples for our .22LR CCW-toting crowd-protector.

You just don't get it. And I don't think you ever will. As sad as that it, it doesn't surprise me coming from you.

^^^ <lmao> Kinda reminds me of a story... Two guys were flying into Yuma one Thanksgiving, to meet us in the dunes... DNP knows this one, too... <laughs>

You really don't have a fucking clue as to what you're talking about... No clue. What you have posted is some of the dumbest $hit I think I've ever read. It isn't ANYONE'S responsibility to protect strangers, except for LEOs, if they're present. It's not MY responsibility to protect some a$shole getting the $hit kicked out of him at a red light. It's not MY responsibility to save strangers and random people when some fucking whacko goes off in a gun-free zone. It's not MY responsibility to save everyone in a crowded movie theater... People are responsible for THEMSELVES. THEY have to make that choice. Just because I carry doesn't mean everyone else's problems are mine.

I won't lie - I laughed pretty damned hard when I read that... <lmao> Rene needs a road trip. I'm just sayin'...

Shepp, that looks good, man! <thumbsup>

Did you open carry before you got your concealed license? Didn't you just get your concealed license, very, very recently?

Really - is that 16 years total, or 6 of the 10 (total) were in NavSpecWar?

Those poll-bastards screwed us on the last one. It was a runaway victory, but they had loopholes. They're still on The List...

^^^ The threads definitely won't be different. That's an industry-wide standard. The length is the same as standard stuff out there. Otherwise, you'd never, ever be able to use an A1 or A2 stock.

Same exact situation with the Barnes TSX, brother. I ended up running an identical load for the 5.56 70gr TSX as my 75/77 loads. That's a damn long projo.

I use a long entended mount to bridge the gap. Lock down the long mount onto upper and rail (both), beat the barrel nut into submission. Done.

Rob, pack that CMMG charging handle up and put it in a box. Send to Tom. Tom has 1lb of Tannerite for it... <lmao>

Get ahold of Seekins, and let them know there's definitely a demand for the product. That might make them produce it a little faster.

I'm FUCKING PROUD that you went with that over the Mustang and the Solo. That's a far superior pistol that you acquired for her. You rock, brother. <thumbsup> By the way, she's getting spoiled with $hit, and I'm not seeing anything for you lately. What the fuk do YOU have in the works? Your secrecy is spooky... <lmao>

I've got a Kimber BP Ten II. Great double-stack 1911, IMHO. Love that pistol. Despite all the $hit I give Jon about him forcing me to buy my first polymer pistol, as the XD45, that BP Ten II is the first polymer pistol I ever had, back in 2004. Ballistics are ballistics, and that's all there is to it. The Geneva/Hague Convention along with the Law Of Land Warfare is what governs "legal ammunition" for combat. That only goes so far, though. We run different ammo now, in the modern age of combat, and that is in accordance with Geneva/Hague and the Law of Land Warfare. Fukc, I had full mags of Mk262 for my M4 on an Afghani-Land deployment in late 2003. Those are OTM - "Open Tip Match" - not "hollow-points." That is in accordance with G/H and the LoLW. 5.56 optimized brown tip ammo is legal - that's Barnes 70gr TSX ammo. SOST is legal, also called OTMRP - that's Mk318 Barrier Blind Ammo. There's a bunch of new $hit out there that's combat-legal, and it doesn't have to be ball ammunition. The .45 ACP with a modern application of the G/H and LoLW can be a bad motherfucker. And it will be. A hell of alot more badass than the same legal cartridge in 9mm, .40, or .357/.357 Sig. We on't need to be shooting people with rifle cartridges out of a pistol - like the 5.7. Modern, legal, pistol ammo will do just fine out of a pistol. You don't use a pistol as your primary combat weapon anymore. It's a backup. When you need your backup, it needs to park motherfuckers on the curb forever - not just wound them. T-Zone and CNS is what you need to fall back on, but you need a dependable, combat-legal cartridge that will do it, too, even if you're "outside the margin" a little. Modern ammo gives you that leeway. You guys are debating modern combat munitions - without being in modern combat. I hate to say it, but LE is not modern combat, as much as LE duty is fighting-for-you-life at times. That's my 2 fukkin cents on it. You bastards are interrupting my manufacture of 300BLK casings.

Jee-bus, I'm having engraving flashbacks all over again...

Phone call is in order. Right-away kinda phone call. like a 911... Roger, you blind-sided me - so I have to spend more now... <lmao>