98Z5V

We both posted - you better look into those options... :banana:

Indeed, it's not Anorexic to say the least. The lightest 1~4 I've tried yet has to be the Leupold Mark AR, Mod 1. That one doesn't break the bank, either, and DAMN that glass is nice. <thumbsup>

That. Is. Sweet. Don't take any $hit, SIG!!! :banana:

What makes me think they'd jump in there with BOTH FEET, looking for "revenue," is the way they treat rainwater right now. I have my own property, I put rainwater catch-barrels under spouts - and some county, city, state or federal entity comes after me for "stealing" rainwater? Fuk you, it fell on MY property... Them trying to tell me differently means they control the weather, so they own the rights to the water that falls. Even if it's on my land. They're only argument is that they obviously control the weather, because they MADE it rain over my land, right? Otherwise, they can suck my jockstrap. They'll do it with solar roadways, bet yer arse - if it ever become more than a pipe-dream. The rainwater stuff is scary enough - Check out all the news on it: https://www.google.com/#q=rainwater+rights Check out the EPA, going after this guy for building a pond on his own property - can you imagine a fine of $75,000 PER DAY?! Watch the vid... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/19/feds-target-private-pond/ That's not tin-foil stuff - it's happening right now. "Clean Water Act" will morph into "Assisted Solar Act" in short order, if Reid or this current Prez could find a way into it. We'd get the $hit taxed out of us.

Shoot the guy an email - it's listed at the bottom of his original post.

Try BCM,

Bull$hit. John Noveske won that battle for everybody, already. If it doesn't reduce the decibel level, it doesn't matter WHERE the decibel level is directed. If it doesn't reduce the decibel level, it's not a "sound suppressor." Period.

Never heard of red barn armory. Young Manufacturing: http://youngmanufacturing.net/ They're right in town here.

Make wood frames with a chickenwire backing in them. Secure your targets to the chickwire with wooden clothes pins. Seriously.

Hell, they're doing it right now, and we see it everyday. And we do nothing. You KNOW they'll get their hands in the pot, with "grants" and such, then let us have it! Al Gore invented the internet, so you KNOW OBummer will say he "pioneered the current solar technology..." Harry Reid will be in there somewhere, too, making BA-JILLIONS.

Just imagine, in this power-hungry-government that we have now,... TOTAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF ALL ROADWAYS, PARKING LOTS, SIDEWALKS, AND DRIVEWAYS. I'll pass.

Damn, dude - I had to go back and see who posted that! I was about to get into someone's a$s for talking $hit about you - and I saw it was you... <laughs>

Hope all my brothers have a very good day today. Keep the vets in your mind, be around your family, and appreciate what you've got. <thumbsup>

WAAAAAAY too much magnification for that distance. You're screwing yourself that way. You're relying too much on equipment, it seems like. Learn how to shoot first. Shoot iron sights at 100 yards, and see how small you can get your groups. $hit, start with irons at 25 yards. Become a good fundamental shooter first, and add capabilities and equipment over time.

I managed to download a chunk of that video before it was "removed in your country..." What kinda $hit is that?! "removed in my country" my a$s. YT Censors strike again. I knew they were out there, but that's ridiculous.

^^^ I'm with him. Cali Ed... There's a VERY WELL KNOWN rule on this board... If YOU ask about something, and NOBODY ELSE ON THIS BOARD has ever tried it... YOU have to buy it, try it, and report back. FACT. (^^^just like greenmist would say it - FACT!)

Dude has lost his $hit... There's probably NO recovery.

Former range I lived by had steel at 100 through 400 in 50 yards increments. I could ring steel all the way through with just minor sight holdover on a 100-yard zero. The 525 and 575 required a little more holdover, or elevation changes, but the ammo did it's job very well. It's good ammo. When it was available all the time, which was prior to December 2012, it was around $16/box of 20. It's very worthy ammo for the price it carries.

He certainly does have a couple issues... <lmao>

Nope, common misbelief. The index pin does not lock the extension to the barrel. It never should.

^^^ Yep, and if you notice, right before I took that shot, instead of my non-firing hand holding or bracing the bottom of the buttstock, I switched to a balled fist under the bottom of the buttstock - exact same principle and use as the squeeze bag. Tighten up the fist, raises the buttstock, lowers the sights. Relax the fist, lowers the buttstock, raises the sights. I got the height right for the shot, and did it. That was the first time I'd ever shouldered/shot Greg's LaRue rifle, and he has a PRS with Accu-Shot monopod on it - I had to take a minute to get used to the setup, before shooting it. That thing shoots like a dream... <thumbsup>

Damn, that 14.5" 308 barrel has my attention. $HIT! :rant2:

If you're talking about that pic above ^^^ it's a Millett DMS-1, 1~4x scope, illuminated donut-dot reticle. They're good scopes, and won't break the bank.

Barrel extensions are torqued to barrels at 175lb/ft. That's a hell of alot of torque. That's all during the manufacturing process of the barrel itself, and not a "user maintenance" area. Nothing you've done to the rifle should have made that extension loose, so you're good to go. First, the extension goes on the barrel, the extension is trimmed if necessary to meet proper headspace. Then the barrel index pin goes in 180 degrees off the bottom of the extension. Then gas port gets drilled. You can't just retorque the extension and call it good, That's why the guys are saying your barrel should be replaced - that's the proper thing for the manufacturer to do. <thumbsup>

I've been wanting to pick one of these up - good writeup, brother. <thumbsup>