98Z5V

Zero need, 10 Arnold-sized bodybuilders aren't lifting that thing out, when it's loaded. You could chain it down to make yourself feel better, but when you load one of these things up, it is HEAVY...

I wasn't poking at you, brother - just that jackass agent that wanted to be a stud in the club, gun pops out, he has no trigger discipline snatching it up, and shoots a patron in the leg... What a fuktard. Heard that nothing happened with that, he's clean on the whole thing... I caught the reference, though, and it made me laugh about that asshead...

You were afflicted...

@Magwa you'll get a kick out of this one, brother. Here's a "professional voice coach of the stars" critiquiing Dave Draiman,and Sound of Silence - she's never heard of him,or heard him sing this before. The comments are EPIC... There are so many more...

Saw Floyd twice on the same tour. Austin Civic Center in 1998 1988, FUCKING CRAZY PERFORMANCE!!!. Got moved to Fort Devens, Mass in 1989 for a short training course, and heard on the radio that they were playing Foxboro Staduim - grabbed tickets and WENT! That one was even crazier than the concert in Austin! Disturbed version of Sound of Silence is artwork, brother. Just artwork.

WTF...

You motherfucker...

@unforgiven let's start a separate thread on this thing - your build and your scope, and the scope info, so we can it out of a general thread, where it just gets polluted with what things are on order here.That's the only way we can give this some justice, brother. Make a thread with the serious details, brother...

Undercover FBI Agent wannabe... I caught that mention you made, and it was EXCELLENT!...

Accuracy pics? You got anything that shows the accuracy of these super-fat barrels? I'm sure they do well, but there's been no target pics of date, that I could find. I'd love to see those. It's gotta be serious...

You're way good, Doc - WAY good. I'm going to address this right now, though, because I saw this bullshiit on another forum that I won't mention, from a guy that thought he was super-important on that forum, and thought he was a god on this platform ON that forum (because of the lack of knowledge on this platform, THERE, on that forum...) On common AR platforms there are only THREE (3) receiver extension lengths, only. That does NOT COUNT Rock River Arms, and their LAR-8, and the previous Bushmaster BAR-10 that it was designed from. It does NOT include those guns - they are an anomoly - but a prevalent platform. There are THREE (3) receiver extension lengths, period. RIFLE RECEIVER EXTENSION = 9 11/16" internal depth. Period. There is no varience, there is no "give or take." It's fixed. People argue "A1 and A2!!!" They're fucking identical. Those that don't know that can research the differences between an A1 buttstock, and an A2 buttstock - and it's adaptors that are required to run that STOCK on the A1 rifle receiver extension - Yes, it's true - the difference it the buttstock and the adaptors required - NOT the extension. 9 11/16" internal depth, Rifle Receiver Extension. Period. AR15 Carbine Receiver Extension = 7.000" internal depth. Done deal. There's a .gov TDP (Technical Data Package) on it. It's not a little short, or a little long. It's not 7.100" in internal depth. It's 7.000" internal depth. Armalite (original manufacturer of the system) actually lists it at 6 15/16" if I remember the data from @mrraley correctly. Maybe the TDP data was a fight with Armalite and Colt (previous holders of the TDP), but the truth is - that 1 /16" isn't affecting your AR15 Carbine at all. Armalite AR-10 Carbine Receiver Extension = it's 7 5/8" internal depth, period. Nothing more, nothing less. It's not "between 7 3/4" and 8"..." That's bullshiit. It's 7 5/8" internal depth on the damn nose, every single time. There's no varience, or "tolerance" in that, in any way. It is designed at that internal depth in order to run a 3.250" buffer that weighs 5.4 oz, with a specific spring, to run a .308AR rifle. VLTOR found a way to run THAT extension on the M16 for the US Marine Corps. They used the dimensions of the AR-10 Carbine Receiver Extension, with a "longer" AR15 Carbine Buffer (4.000" long) on a rifle-gas, 20" barreled M16A4, for the US Marine Corps. That made the 20" barreled M16A4 function properly, WITHOUT a rifle buttstock, and give the Marine Corps a collapsible buttstock for those rifles. The internal depth on the VLTOR extension for that is exactly 7 5/8". MagPul has come out with an extension, specifically listed for use with the KAC SR-25 and the KAC M110 - the don't list the internal depth, just the OAL on it, but the internal depth is 7 5/8". Period. It's this one: https://www.magpul.com/products/magpul-enhanced-receiver-extension-sr25-m110 Anyone that wants to argue this logic can just bring it. You can't refute the proof, there's zero way to do that. You just cannot. If you want to argue that there's a "tolerance" or a "range" that the receiver extension can be manufactured to - you're wrong. There can be an OAL difference, but that doesn't matter. You cannot alter the internal depth of these receiver extensions, and have perfect function of them. I've personally had, in my own hands, a PSA PA-10 Carbine receiver extension that measured 8.000" internal depth. In my own hands. There were serious impact marks in the ears of the lower receiver. That was @sketch's own gun... We stacked quarters to make that fucker run for the weekend, and not smash his hardware anymore than it was already smashed. You cannot, in any way, make any varience whatsoever, to the receiver extension internal depth. It's one of three, and no more. it's 9 11/16", or 7.000", or 7 5/8". Done. RRA, you guys come up with your own stuff - that Bushmaster developed on the BAR-10. You guys are identical to the BAR-10. Off this thing now...

He'll see it, eventually - if he reads closely enough...

Heavy.com nails it down on the guy: https://heavy.com/news/2019/05/girard-damien-saenz/ Also, this is NOT alot of ammo. This amount of ammo doesn't even scratch the surface, in accordance with the amount of firearms that were supposedly seized. This amount doesn't even start a cap-gun fight.

This guy had it going on... (check the name of this uploaded pic closely... - Hidden Treasures are what this place is about... )

I just looked at the overhead pics - he's got me...

Really?! Come hang out with me for a weekend.

I had to go find out what you were talking about... https://www.tmz.com/2019/05/08/gun-confiscation-massive-huge-firearms-los-angeles-holmby-hills/ https://abc7chicago.com/gun-seizure-at-los-angeles-home-finds-massive-cache-of-weapons-1-arrested/5291547/ https://www.tmz.com/2019/05/09/massive-gun-confiscation-firearms-holmby-hills-suspect-gunpoint-malibu/

THE ARMALITE AR-10 CARBINE RECEIVER EXTENSIONS WILL BE 7 5/8" IN INTERNAL DEPTH, WITH ZERO VARIENCE. EVER. THAT NEVER CHANGES. IT'S NOT AN "AVERAGE" OR A "TOLERANCE." Just thought I'd toss that out there. There is ZERO VARIENCE on an internal depth of a receiver extension on an AR-based rifle, no matter what the size. You're not working with "adjustable pushrods in a Harley" here. *** That's not aimed at you Doc - that's aimed at the stupid comment above that stated: ^^^ That statement is complete bullshiit, and a total fallacy.

^^^ This guy knows the answer...

My .260 Rem observances - my LaRue LT-158 mount places the centerline of the optic 1.44" above the top of the rail, and it clears the rail on my Athlon 50mm objective with ease. It has no MOA build into it. I can dial to 13.5 mils of drop, which is good for over 1300 yards on my load, with a 100 yard zero on it - just dialing. That scope is supposed to have 18 mil total elevation adjustment, but I just now dialed 13.5 mils drop on it, right now, in that mount. That's money, right there. Every 10 moa of cant in a scope base gives you another 3.4377 mils of adjustment in available drop travel. Don't exceed your scope's internal travel, or you'll be doing something other than a 100-yard zero for it. Here's a story - Put a 30 moa rail on the .300 Win Mag. I maxed the shiit out of the elevation travel, and at 100 yards, bottomed out, I can't get it to zero at 100 yards - it's 0.5 mil high, at 100 yards. There's no "dial" left in it, it's maxed. That 0.5 mil high has me at a 225 yard zero on the gun. It's got 22.5 mils of drop in it now, though, - just dialing - so I'll take that. I can dial-only that motherfucker to 1875 yards - but I don't have a 100-yard zero anymore... Do your math on the scope first, and check it's internal travel max - and then check it/verify that when you get it - before you buy a mount for it... Run the math on your rig, bro. Check your scope first. Example - that Athlon Argos BTR 6~24x50 I have is listed as 18 mils of total elevation adjustment. I just dialed 13.5 mils of drop on it, then dialed 7.8mils of elevation on it... That's not 18 mils of total travel, it's 21.3 mils of total travel...

I love music, all of it. Bands with a real message, though - are by far my favorites. In the early '90s, it seems like the only band with a real message was QueensRyche. There was a real meaning in all of their lyrics, and they turned it into music - and art. Next one that hit me was Disturbed, and Dave Draiman. They are epic. Draiman is well educated, with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Government, Philosophy, and Business Administration. There's meaning in the lyrics of all their songs. Then, you have FFDP. No band has every done more for the military, ever. What they do for First Responders is unreal. They give back to the organizations that support those efforts - and they always have a strong, clear message, in every song. It's "not just music" for them. That's the music that moves me. That's 3, 2, and 1, right there. For those reasons. Any band that can recreate an original - and do it better than the original... Amazing.

Here's another slightly different version of it, brother. With credits to Kenny Wayne Shepherd (the original songwriter, 1997), Brantley Gilbert, and Brian May - all in the vid together. This is a big tip of the hat to First Responders, by FFDP. Quote slide at the end of this one:

More FFDP. Blue on Black.

Further research reveals that this is an issue with wear on upper receivers - otherwise, ZEV wouldn't make this expensive billet upper receiver that combats the wear of their charging handle - this is a specifically machined upper, that takes a threaded steel pin, on the charging handle lock on the upper: Here's where I gleaned that information: https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/10/jeremy-s/new-zev-tech-ar-15-ar-10-rifles-components/ A little bit of research looks like it solves this issue. The issue is your charging handle.

I think I found your problem: