98Z5V

Brass looks fine. You're gonna see an ejector swipe on almost every round. Those in your pics aren't a problem.

Seriously. Just a stroke of a pen... Department of Justice issues voluntary smart-gun guidelines http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/20/department-justice-issues-voluntary-smart-gun-guidelines.html Published November 20, 2016 The Obama administration on Wednesday announced a series of specifications for smart-gun manufacturers, born out of the president’s January executive action aimed at curbing gun violence. But there’s a catch to the new set of guidelines: They’re voluntary. “This project was designed to spur the growth of enhanced gun safety technology – and not to mandate that any particular individual or law enforcement agency adopt the technology once developed,” the Department of Justice wrote in a blog post. The DOJ’s National Institute of Justice developed the specifications, which include recommendations for how smart guns should be able to be unlocked and a default state that would allow guns to fire if the technology malfunctioned, engadget reported. The White House said the specifications are meant to ensure that smart-gun technology “available to law enforcement agencies is safe and reliable” and to demonstrate that a demand exists for weapons with enhanced safety features. Officials also said they hope the specifications will give manufacturers guidance about the basic requirements that law enforcement agencies expect from the technology. But critics of the DOJ’s baseline specifications quickly emerged, with the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action penning an essay Friday that questioned what, if anything, the Obama administration’s smart-gun effort accomplished. “But it appears the president hopes to portray the publication of the document as a ‘win’ during his waning days in office,” the piece stated. The NRA-ILA memo also called into question the basic practicality of smart guns if, as the DOJ admits in its own recommendations, the technology has the ability to fail. “Any firearm that won’t fire when it’s needed just isn’t ‘smart,’” the NRA-ILA wrote. “And any ‘security’ system that defaults to turning itself off during a problem just isn’t secure.” As part of his January executive action, Obama directed the government to review the availability of smart-gun technology on a regular basis. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

That's fine for a bolt action, but not for a semi auto. Bullet setback. From recoil. It's real...

Do some more research on that one. There are miles and miles of bad reviews, over time,on that POS trigger.

DON'T COMPLICATE SCHIT WITH COMPLICATED SCHIT...

I'm not seeing the snow...

That was my sentiment, all the time. I got to spend ALOT of time doing schit at work, that adrenaline junkies PAY ALOT OF MONEY TO GO DO!!!... And it was my job...

One of two things is going on here, based on this description - it's under gassed, and the BCG isn't fully cycling, which is causing the round to not clear the ejection port (low bolt carrier speed, due to under-gassing). OR, its weak extraction, with the extractor is letting go of the spent case before it's fully clearing the chamber - then it just bounces around and doesn't get ejected. One quick test to see which one it is - open that gas block ALL the way up, chamber one round, as Wash stated, and see if it locks back after firing. If it does, you're not under-gassed, and it's a weak-extractor problem. Solved, pending shooting result.

That's cool - with brand new springs, that have never been cycled, until you loaded them, right? Magazines get "broken in" as well as all other moving parts. Double Feeds are always a magazine problem. Double Feed - two live rounds trying to enter the chamber at the same time. ^^^ If you have one spent round that didn't extract or eject, and a live one trying to feed, that's not a Double Feed... That's a different malfunction.

That's a magazine issue. Period. Change mags and use a mag that feeds reliably. Open the gas port all the way up. Conduct testing. If it's not cycling properly like that ^^^ - then get back with details of what it's doing. Double-feeds are ONLY a magazine problem.

The pic up there ^^^ is a 15" on a 20" barrel. This is the same 15" on the 18" barrel...

Don't leave Aero Precision out of the running... This is their 15" keymod, but they have the same rail in M-LOK.

I'm in - love Nordic Comp. Run some of their shotgun parts, have a couple AR barrels that shoot the damn lights out... They rock. Oh, and I'm winning the rifle...

Definitely the wrong area for that topic... However, this is the correct area - post the question in here, and you'll get a lot more responses... https://forum.308ar.com/forum/21-optics-amp-mounts-buissights/ Check out the 4-14x offerings from Primary Arms, in FFP, with mil-dots.

Hot damn, that is excellent!!!

I've posted this before -

Nope.

Shepp, I've installed lots of these, various sizes. The cheapies work just as well as the expensive Rigid Ind. light bars do. Until you crash it... You can't go wrong with the cheapies, so have no fear. They'll work, and work well.

Got my notification about 10am today, Dave - Thanks again, man - you rock!...

You got it - it looks like he was asking you if you were using the castle nut, brother... I didn't know which way his question was going, so tossed up the info...

Not on a rifle-length receiver extension - the stock does all that. Castle nuts and endplates are only on carbine-stock setups. Not on rifle-stock setups.

Was just looking at that!... Great price!

There's also a Nikon P-Rimfire (2~7 magnification) that has the marked turrets, instead of covers over the clickers... Nikon MSRP $179...

I swear by the Nikon P-22 3-9x40 scope. I've got two of them on Ruger 10/22s, and another one on a Savage FV-SR rifle. Badass scope. Should have a street price of under $150. Nikon's MSRP is $119, so street price should be a little less...

I appreciate the hell out of the men and women who are still doing it - and stuck to it through the last 8 years.