argument settled.

[blue109]

Costa said so. Glad we can put all this behind us now

http://www.tactical-life.com/gear/45-acp-vs-9mm-ammo/#bsum-buffoni

[shepp]

Good read I'm gonna schedule that for the fb page

[wetncold]

I still like my 45's. I own a 9mm now, but it's my truck gun. Need more shots on moving targets.

[Robocop1051]

The main argument for 9mm is still; high capacity and cheaper to practice with.

The main argument for the .45 is still; bigger holes

We needed 14 "experts" to regurgitate 100 year old arguments.

[blue109]

No robo...only one expert was neededed.

[392heminut]

But what about the 40? <dontknow> >:D <lmao>

Edited May 21, 2015 by 392heminut

[slugger43]

But what about the 40? <dontknow> >:D <lmao>

 

Exactly!  And I'll bet nobody who ever sucked down one of those thinks of it as a "compromise round"....Hey, it's my go-to!

[blue109]

Here's your .40 expert!

https://youtu.be/9ABCiPJRCyA

[Matt.Cross]

It's a reverse psychology ploy to keep them from getting in gunfights where they have to face a .45ACP. I don't blame them, I don't want to be up against one either. :D

[planeflyer21]

There was a study a couple of decades ago on caliber used vs. distance the gun fight started.  IIRC, the .38 and .357 had the closest engagements, 9mm not far behind, with the .45acp coming in the furthest at 21'.

 

The author concluded that people who carried .45s were smarter and didn't let perps get too close. 

[98Z5V]

^^^  I'm with him...  <lmao>  :happydrunks:

[sketch]

Selling all my 9's were easy and I made money on the deals!