Houston Area Deputy Killed Execution-Style

[DNP]

I'm not expecting the fellow prisoners to be his biggest issue...

[slugger43]

If you really want to get pissed off take a look at this.   http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/black-lives-matter-march/2015/08/29/id/672609/

Yes, I'm really pissed off.  The murder was a hate crime....and so is chanting about killing LE.  Supreme Court has long ago determined that freedom of speech is not absolute.  The old "yelling "Fire!" in a theater, example.  Inciting to murder police is sickening.  The black lives matter people are just disgusting.

Thanks to all of the LE who go out there and fight the good fight in spite of this crap.  Hang in there.  Remember the vast majority of us are on your side.

[MikedaddyH]

If you really want to get pissed off take a look at this.   http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/black-lives-matter-march/2015/08/29/id/672609/

Bad taste and bad timing ! They should have canceled it !

[EngrBob]

Bad taste and bad timing ! They should have canceled it !

I am afraid this goes way beyond bad taste and timing.  This defines that movement as completely racist and anti-law enforcement and therefore, by definition, anarchist. This movement needs to be put down like a rabid animal.

[DNP]

"Let's mob together...block traffic...throw racial slurs around and threaten people's lives.  That should bring some attention and sympathy to our situation!"

 

Seriously...someone needs to point out to these folks that this is NOT how you get people to like you. This IS how you start a fight however. 

Edited September 1, 2015 by DNP

[DNP]

Right after posting that, I had a thought. If you think LEO is trigger happy now and that they are quicker to shoot someone based on race....how do you defuse that?  Make threats, start randomly killing officers, basically operate as a terrorist?  Subconsciously you are making it worse. Every encounter with a black person now holds that much more tension. The officer is that much more on edge whether they know it or not.  My guess is that most of them know it.   They aren't that way because they're racist. They're that way because that movement is creating it. 

[98Z5V]

And now there's a manhunt underway in/near Chicago for 3 armed fukbags that killed another police officer.  This shiit is outta control.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/01/manhunt-on-for-gunman-after-cop-reportedly-killed-in-chicago/?intcmp=hpbt1

[planeflyer21]

Right after posting that, I had a thought. If you think LEO is trigger happy now and that they are quicker to shoot someone based on race....how do you defuse that?  Make threats, start randomly killing officers, basically operate as a terrorist?  Subconsciously you are making it worse. Every encounter with a black person now holds that much more tension. The officer is that much more on edge whether they know it or not.  My guess is that most of them know it.   They aren't that way because they're racist. They're that way because that movement is creating it. 

It isn't just Black Lives Matter but also Farrakhan (by implication those in the nation of islam) and the NBPP. A local radio host (who is a maligned black conservative) was yelling at regular media yesterday "You idiots don't understand!  This is a race way!  You think they want a solution but they have their solution:  kill white people and kill law enforcement."

The James T. Harris Show, 1400 MST every week day:  http://www.1041kqth.com/listen-live/

[shepp]

I saw a good sign in a prodomenetly black neighborhood the other day "stop the violence". Plain and simple no race pushing.

that guy is right flyer, these people are all about "hope and change" but that's it just the words there's nothing behind it just like their dear great leaders presidency........

[jtallen83]

And now there's a manhunt underway in/near Chicago for 3 armed fukbags that killed another police officer.  This shiit is outta control.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/09/01/manhunt-on-for-gunman-after-cop-reportedly-killed-in-chicago/?intcmp=hpbt1

 I hope this is "out of control" meaning there is no plan.....the biggest fear I have is that this is exactly what some want, if this is social engineering run amok we are in for big trouble.

[98Z5V]

I do believe this is all highlighted for a couple reasons - MSM needs to keep these types if news stories going, and there is a plan.

1st - it's shocking.  It's unbelievable that people - criminals, thugs, shitbags - are directly targeting police officers. 

2nd - the more of these stories that are out there, and the more coverage they get, makes it easier to get the Gen Pop all pissed off and go along with some type of national/federal control over local law enforcement.

I seriously think that there IS an agenda moving in that direction - and it's moving fast.

[MikedaddyH]

If you really want to get pissed off take a look at this.   http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/black-lives-matter-march/2015/08/29/id/672609/

This is getting to be like 1968 ALL over again. Our country should remember history so we don't repeat it !

Riots ,Race Wars and Assassinations ! 

The National Guard taking over houses and displacing families. That $hit happened to my family. The N.G. mounted a machine gun on the roof of our library at our family home in CLEVELAND ! WE had to stay at my aunts house.

[GRA]

It IS anarchic in nature and it needs to be stopped as soon as possible.

Hard to call it anything BUT social engineering; they are trying to bend societal minds to refuse to acknowledge both the deliberate and implied authority of the former majority.  

I firmly agree that our socialist media is aware of the possibilities of all the above and they are trying to facilitate the movement (for lack of a better term) while boosting their own ratings and/or maintaining what attention they presently have.  Ferguson and Baltimore (reminds us of the LA riot era .... ???) was spectacular news and the media will ride that high was long as possible.

I also think all this drama provides the Anointed One the opportunities he's always tried to "time" for; he seems to wait until something like this happens to slip something under the table to later bring out and stab us all in the back with.

 

Edited September 1, 2015 by GRA

[MikedaddyH]

Rope-A-Dope... Or ... Watch the right hand while the left does the dirty deed !

King Barry would do anything to cancel the election.

[GreyGoose]

98Z5V

I seriously think that there IS an agenda moving in that direction - and it's moving fast.

It already has been taken over and already is currently federally controlled.

Local law enforcement can't do jack $h!t outside of write a traffic ticket without federal involvement, and that's even a stretch, a simple motor vehicle stop is screened, scrutinized, and shared thru federal databases.

Google "fusion center"

But it gets even weirder, not only is it the information from every LE - Civillian contact that is compiled and shared amongst multiple federal agencies, but so is your every bank transaction, every electronic communication, your license plate scans, etc etc etc.

Ron Paul was our out, or a  decent start in that direction anyway, but the establishment squashed that of course, he was about non globalist intervention, free markets, and civil liberty... and they can't have any of that stuff, it would interfere with their wealth accumulation, total population control, and the whole NWO agenda.

...and so now... we're pretty much all just f**ked.

Edited September 1, 2015 by GreyGoose

[jtallen83]

...and so now... we're pretty much all just f**ked.

They may find me dead but my body will be lying on a big ol' pile of brass...I fuk back, otherwise it would just be rape!

LIBERTY FIRST!

[GRA]

It already has been taken over and already is currently federally controlled.

Local law enforcement can't do jack $h!t outside of write a traffic ticket without federal involvement, and that's even a stretch, a simple motor vehicle stop is screened, scrutinized, and shared thru federal databases.

Google "fusion center"

But it gets even weirder, not only is it the information from every LE - Civillian contact that is compiled and shared amongst multiple federal agencies, but so is your every bank transaction, every electronic communication, your license plate scans, etc etc etc.

Ron Paul was our out, or a  decent start in that direction anyway, but the establishment squashed that of course, he was about non globalist intervention, free markets, and civil liberty... and they can't have any of that stuff, it would interfere with their wealth accumulation, total population control, and the whole NWO agenda.

...and so now... we're pretty much all just f**ked.

I think this mass LEO data compilation has been going on since the Rodney King fiasco.  I think it was easier for the guvmint to do than a lot of folks expected.  It probably wasn't even viewed as an issue when it started.

If the King fiasco had happened somewhere other than a major city it may never have come to this, or maybe as fast.  Back then California still had a significant influence as a trend setter and somewhat still does, just not as a conservative state.  A major riot like that happening in CA just could not be tolerated anywhere else.  Herein lies the roots of the Patriot Act.

They've been tracking bank transactions since Nixon resigned.  Reason; can you imagine what it was like in the early 70(s) to collect taxes after Watergate and before Saigon fell, let alone Tricky Dick being pardoned?  IMHO, contrary to popular opinion, tracking large sums of money did NOT start with the drug wars, but initially with Prohibition, and again later in the 70(s) due to a sudden increase in mass tax evasion due to corrupt politics and politicians.  After all, and as usual, WE THE PEOPLE had to pay for a very costly war.

After Reagan, we had our first chance with Perot but that didn't work out.  Great ideas and philosophy here but he came across as too much of a hot-head and too high-strung.

Later, we get Ron Paul.  Paul's ideas, philosophy, and agenda alone should've won over most concerned and conservative voters, and it did for a lot of people.  The problem was that Paul is not that great of an orator, he doesn't have the political "sales" finesse that some of his opponents did.  Additionally, Paul had the same problem Perot had; he had a streak of being too high-strung.  Both of them would've succeeded had they been better, smoother political salesmen.

Similarly you have Barbara Bachman.  She's got great ideas but every time she speaks she sounds like a RA-RA-RA cheerleader and the message just doesn't catch.  Too bad.  I'd sure as hell vote for her if she was the only choice.

Our Constitution is far from dead but it's steadily fading in a slow downward spiral.  Adding to the erosion is the current anarchy situation that we are now seeing coming out of it's infancy.  It's complicated; racial, political, cultural, and again, deep-rooted in corruption.We have a slight chance to get the right person in office but this will for the longest time be an extreme uphill climb.

We have what Trump is currently offering and if he would tap Sarah Palin for his running mate this would be ideal but I don't know if both of them together would stand a chance of winning.  Judge Jeanine would also be great, as would Judge Napolitano.  Nobody is going to be perfect.

Just today, Cruz, Jindal, and Rubio came under very intense fire for birth location qualifications.  If Trump taps one of them this will surely never go away.   How much difference it will make is hard to tell because after the Anointed One folks may not be phased by the law requiring a natural-born citizen to be a minimum qualifier for office.  Dr. Ben Carson was quoted today as supporting amnesty.  This scratches him off my list for sure, especially when that appeals court in IL just rendered a decision stating illegals have the right to own firearms.

Who does this leave that is a serious Constitutionalist and/or 2nd. Amendment supporter?  Not many I feel that are always sincere.  The political situation doesn't look too good with regards to getting someone in office that will uphold the rule of law thus offsetting potential anarchy.  We are indeed moving towards that.

As for the execution of cops continuing, it will most likely turn out like this; it will happen a bit more then the cops will get tired of it and say screw it, and start getting a little tougher (and I sure as hell don't blame them, if anything they may wait too long).  Unfortunately this will lead to more killings, racial riots, madness, and mayhem.  The Anointed One is just chomping at the but to declare martial law due to civil unrest.  He's admitted this in public in almost as many words.

It's all a catastrophic circle, with the Weather Underground Poster Child / Anointed One and the socialist/communist media waiting in the receiving line getting ready to grin all the way to the bank.

[DNP]

Screw em. Let them police their own neighborhoods for a while. 

[GreyGoose]

Lets face it, we are the beneficiary of only one thing via our beloved US government these days, and that is knowing what it feels like to be a modern day slave.

Sure I own some property (and because of tax law will forever be indebted for it), I own things to protect myself, family, and property (but have to dance like a jester in front of the king just to do so), etc etc...

I push out wherever I can to exercise my "rights", I live in a safe rural area, I home school my children, I drink unfluoridated water, we don't vaccinate them, but its getting harder and harder, and in the end its becoming clear that soon my children will live a more futile existence than we did, in my generation we let it all slip away.

Ah hell, drink up and lets all go look at SS's sunbathing partner!

Cheers!

[planeflyer21]

As Gra points out, there is a continued pattern since JFK got whacked.

You skipped Goldwater though, the first GOP cannibalized "people's candidate", torn apart by the party elites in conjunction with the media.  Same was done with Perot.  The game with Ron Paul was blatant, they aren't even trying to hide their shenanigans anymore.

It's easy to get reeled into the hyperbole but the game is fixed.  Gone are the jury box and the ballot box, and societal elite have made the soapbox ineffectual.

Only one box left and there seems to be no gumption to use it.

[mrmackc]

 

Only one box left and there seems to be no gumption to use it.

no,.....not. yet maybe I'll live long enough to participate, if not I've got a son trained,armed, and ready and a couple of grandsons in training.   We all have some of that good old USA military training that will help.

[jtallen83]

 Dr. Ben Carson was quoted today as supporting amnesty.  This scratches him off my list for sure, especially when that appeals court in IL just rendered a decision stating illegals have the right to own firearms.

 

Make sure you get the whole story on Carson, they are doing there best to smear him out of the way since he started to catch on with the people. What I've heard him say did not lead me to believe he was in favor of any blanket amnesty, only a realistic way of confronting the issue.

[GreyGoose]

Make sure you get the whole story on Carson, they are doing there best to smear him out of the way since he started to catch on with the people. What I've heard him say did not lead me to believe he was in favor of any blanket amnesty, only a realistic way of confronting the issue.

I think DT beat him to the punch on that one, which is deport them all build a wall and make them get in line to come thru the door.

[jtallen83]

I think DT beat him to the punch on that one, which is deport them all build a wall and make them get in line to come thru the door.

I have some concerns with the "deport them all" idea. Is it realistic, maybe it could be made to happen but not without a massive expansion of the size and scope of the federal government. I'm willing to take a little slower approach and not give the feds any more power, maybe just start making them inforce the laws they have. Even DT gave a starting point of deporting criminals first.

 This problem has been growing rapidly for 20+ years now, a few more years to get things into reverse without stripping the gears is worth it.

[GreyGoose]

I have some concerns with the "deport them all" idea. Is it realistic, maybe it could be made to happen but not without a massive expansion of the size and scope of the federal government. I'm willing to take a little slower approach and not give the feds any more power, maybe just start making them inforce the laws they have. Even DT gave a starting point of deporting criminals first.

 This problem has been growing rapidly for 20+ years now, a few more years to get things into reverse without stripping the gears is worth it.

Agreed, so far as expanding .gov, I think removing the incentives, making it harder to get housing, jobs, etc would be a start.

But the federal government is so expansive already JT that honestly I suspect it would be more a matter of re-configuring it as opposed to enlarging it.

Making .gov smaller would be wonderful, doubtful, but wonderful.