Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

Kansas Law Tested


Recommended Posts

Kansas was one of the states to pass a "We can do it in our state if it stays in our state" law for firearms and related products.  Dude made suppressors, dumb customer posted a video of how much he loves his federally illegal suppressor, went to trial:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article116276598.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/22/2016 at 7:57 PM, shepp said:

So basiclly it's like weed, state says it's ok, but over all Feds have the power to prosecute. 

Expand  

It would depend on if the state in question has the nuts to prosecute feds for enforcing unconstitutional laws.  Several states passed such legislation.

Apparently Kansas thusfar has no gumption to pursue it further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/22/2016 at 7:57 PM, shepp said:

So basiclly it's like weed, state says it's ok, but over all Feds have the power to prosecute. 

Expand  

Very much like weed, the federal govt. has no constitutional authority to pass or enforce laws on either one other than interstate traffic/commerce. Problem is the people and states have ceded jurisdiction to the feds by not fighting the issue for decades.

REPEAL THE NFA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  This is not the first State to do this , I'll be waiting for this to play out in  the SCOTUS .

   There is an interesting twist to that Photo in the article , its on the papers he is holding .

http://www.infowars.com/leaked-document-shows-trump-does-actually-plan-to-build-a-wall/

Edited by survivalshop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/22/2016 at 11:05 PM, survivalshop said:

  This is not the first State to do this , I'll be waiting for this to play out in  the SCOUS .

Expand  

I won't.  SCOTUS could say "Manufacturing toilet paper is illegal, people must now wipe with their own dirty laundry before washing it."

Wouldn't make it anymore constitutional just because SCOTUS said so.  

Like JT said about the states ceding power to the feds out of laziness, the same can be said for states ceding authority to every whim of SCOTUS.

I now dub them SCROTUS, ballsack of the nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...