Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

Pistol Brace Update, from 7 Jun 21


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Eat It, ATF - your time is coming, and you're about to be put in your place.  Just like EPA got put in THEIR place. 

This shiit is coming to and end, for you "regulatory agencies."  You don't get to "invent" new laws, especially laws with Felony ramifications...  ATF...

You boys better Brace Yourselves.  It's about to get Dry-Docked right in your asses. Yeah, no lube.  Jammed in.  

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-moves-block-bidens-pistol-brace-rule-abuse-rule-making-authority

GOP moves to block Biden’s pistol brace rule: ‘Abuse of rule-making authority’

GOP Reps Andrew Clyde and Richard Hudson will introduce a CRA resolution against the rule on Monday

EXCLUSIVE: House Republicans this week will take a step toward blocking the Biden administration's new rule that tightens regulations on pistol stabilizing braces, and call the rule an "abuse" of federal authority.

The rule, called Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Stabilizing Braces, took effect on Jan. 31 after it was finalized by the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco and Explosives (ATF). It will treat any firearms with stabilizing accessories as short-barreled rifles, which require a federal license to own under the National Firearms Act.

According to Republicans, the rule would require gun owners to either register pistols with stabilizing braces with the ATF, turn over those firearms, or face 10 years in jail and up to $10,000 in fines.\

Reps. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., and Richard Hudson, R-N.C., are leading the effort in the House of Representatives, and plan to introduce a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution on Monday. The resolution would nullify the Biden administration rule if passed by the House and Senate and signed by President Biden, or if Congress were to override a likely Biden veto.

"Congress must swiftly move to block the ATF’s unconstitutional pistol brace rule, as this misguided measure turns millions of law-abiding gun owners, including many disabled veterans, into criminals for merely possessing legal firearms with stabilizing braces," Clyde told Fox News Digital ahead of the introduction of the measure.

Clyde told Fox that the ATF's "abuse of rule-making authority" would violate the Constitution and disregard Congress' legislative authority, and was "nothing more than a reckless attempt to advance President Biden’s ultimate goal of an unarmed America."

"As a fierce defender of our Second Amendment freedoms and one of the few federal firearms licensees in Congress, I’m proud to help lead the fight against the ATF’s latest assault on our unalienable right to keep and bear arms," he added.

Hudson echoed Clyde's warning of the rule's affront to the rights of gun owners across the country. "This rule jeopardizes the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners and disabled combat veterans. I’m proud to lead the fight in blocking the ATF’s unconstitutional pistol brace rule," he told Fox News Digital.

A similar resolution was introduced in the Senate last week by Sens. John Kennedy, R-La., and Roger Marshall, R-Kan.

Gun Owners of America (GOA), a gun rights advocacy group, told Fox News Digital it was fully supportive of both resolutions, and that it had worked with Clyde and Marshall to draft them. It also dismissed any notion that the Biden administration was operating within its means to enforce the rule.

"Biden’s ATF has no authority to mandate that the owners of up to 40,000,000 pistols destroy, turn in, rebuild, or register those guns with the federal government before their arbitrary May 31st compliance deadline," Aidan Johnston, GOA's Director of Federal Affairs, said in a statement.

Other Republican lawmakers also slammed the new rule after it was finalized by the ATF in January, calling it an "unconstitutional overreach" and a "gun registration and confiscation scheme."

Last month, the National Rifle Association was joined in a lawsuit against the Biden administration over the rule by SB Tactical, B&T USA, wounded warrior Richard Cicero, and a coalition of 25 states led by West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey and North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley. States signing onto that effort were Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia and Wyoming.

Edited by 98Z5V
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More common language - from Attorney Tom Grieve again.

Frame and receiver smacked back again.  ALL THIS will get incorporated into the Pistol Brace ruling, when they get smacked around again...  Guarantee it. 

Watch this one...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been making more of a name for himself lately. Between things like holding up the Speaker of the House votes, helping to pound on that little weasel Fauci and now jumping on board to poke at the ATF. I'm liking what I've been seeing out of him. But since I don't live in Florida, it doesn't really matter what I think about him.

All I do know, is that the reps here in Maryland suck cheesy donkey balls. Fukin commies.

Yeah FBI, I said it. You suck too, you traitorous bastards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2023 at 12:04 PM, Turd Furgeson said:

 

Here's something that's not stated about this video - that little fucking WEASEL that's being questioned in that vid works for "Everytown For Gun Safety."  For real.  He's not BATFE, he's a fucking Lobbyist...

Here's a GREAT breakdown of that video testimony, and what all that means.  This is fantastic...  

 

Jim Jordan went on to kick this shiftless POS right in the dick, too.  Here's that one:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This shiit is going on behind the scenes, if you're not keeping up with all the Anti-2A news.  I missed this one, initially, just because of all the garbage that's coming out. 

"Office of Gun Violence Prevention."   Hmmm

Sounds strangely like the "Department of Mis-Information," now, doesn't it?  Same bullshiit being pitched, just different topics.  "Department of Mis-Information" was attacking your 1A rights.  Straight up, that was their goal.

"Office of Gun Violence Prevention" is a different way to attack the 2A.  No other way around it - they just found a new angle to go after it.

Check it:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 98Z5V said:

This shiit is going on behind the scenes, if you're not keeping up with all the Anti-2A news.  I missed this one, initially, just because of all the garbage that's coming out. 

"Office of Gun Violence Prevention."   Hmmm

Sounds strangely like the "Department of Mis-Information," now, doesn't it?  Same bullshiit being pitched, just different topics.  "Department of Mis-Information" was attacking your 1A rights.  Straight up, that was their goal.

"Office of Gun Violence Prevention" is a different way to attack the 2A.  No other way around it - they just found a new angle to go after it.

Check it:

 

Well, at least the DOJ will keep it legit and prevent it from having an agenda detrimental to the 2a. (/sarcasm)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BOOOOYYY!!! 

ATF IS BIG MAD!!! :bat:

 

  :lmao:

 

 

^^^  That's all over "Frames and Receivers," so they're gonna be WAY BUTTHURT when they get completely NEUTERED over this pistol brace shiit that they thought they could just advance, on their own.  (Or, under Creepy Joe's guidance...)

This is gonna get very, very ugly. 

For them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another SMACKdown on this little weasel motherfucker from Everytown For Gun Safety...   and it's good.  Just THINK about this...  THIS IS THE GUY that the Democrats sent to this hearing, to REPRESENT THE DEMOCRAT POSITION on this.  This was THEIR CHOICE, and it was their TOP choice - to send into that hearing.  The ATF Director was requested, for this hearing.  Nope, Dems stated, "We're sending THIS GUY..."  

Fuk.   Hmmm.  Why IS that?!

Our lawmakers look like they're working on it, people - let 'em work on it.  They see what's going on.

This is a Bitch Slap for that little greasy fucker.

 

Edited by 98Z5V
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

NOBODY is talking about THIS!!!

NOBODY!!!

This happened yesterday.  26 Apr 23.

You WILL NOT see this reported in the MSM, ANYWHERE.  I had to find this, based on knowing when the hearing date was - yesterday...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...