Jump to content
308AR.com Community
  • Visit Aero Precision
  • Visit Brownells
  • Visit EuroOptic
  • Visit Site
  • Visit Beachin Tactical
  • Visit Rainier Arms
  • Visit Ballistic Advantage
  • Visit Palmetto State Armory
  • Visit Cabelas
  • Visit Sportsmans Guide

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

RUGER  SR-762 I think someone's sleeping :tweed:  <dontknow>

 

I'm hot on the trail of one of those, Ruger is coming to NC and I may have a connection for getting one at employee cost!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Darn, wish there was more on the 762 here, I'm waiting on mine to show up, LGS is sayin' a few weeks... somewhere I heard they were being allocated... anyone else?

Posted

I've had a DPMS "SASS" for a year or so, and am pleased with it, as a long range shooter, as it is too heavy and unwieldy to carry as a "Patrol Rifle".

I received a Ruger SR-762 a few days ago. I put a Bushnell ET6245F on it, which I "borrowed" from my DPMS.

 

I've been to the range and expended a hundred rounds out to 300 yds utilizing a Caldwell Lead Sled FCX. Overall, 1.5 MOA (not counting reload fliers) using 168 Gr. Federal Premium .308, German NATO 7.62, and Reloads (two fliers). No Failures. Very pleased!

 

I'll put the Bushnell back on the DPMS and put an Aimpoint on the SR-762 as it is comfortable for more of a CQB application.

 

I came across this Forum while searching for info on a "BAD" (Battery Assist Device) for the Ruger. If anyone out there knows of one, please let me know.

Posted

Any personal reviews on this rifle? If it shoots 1.5 moa for the first 100 rounds I would think the barrel would settle to just under moa.

I am bummed to see so little info on here! But I guess that is because people simply buy the Sr762, customization is limited and you really cant build one...

Any info on parts compatibility and manufacturing origins of the ruger parts?

  • 4 months later...
Posted

Well it looks like Ruger has pencil pusher making the decisions about what mags to ship with the SR-762. For whatever reason they stooped using PMags & went to DPMS steel mags that don't work :cookoo: If Ruger has a hair on its butt it will send every owner a credit.

 

http://tinyurl.com/ms6y7hy

Posted

I personally kinda prefer the dpms mag over the p mag due to its construction and size IF it works. If they dont run right, ruger has definitely made a mistake.

They might have done it because magpul is having difficulty keeping up with production. Who knows?

If anyone happens to be selling 3 dpms mags that dont work, my dpms rifle loves them, and I could buy them. ;-)

In fact, if they wanted to give me a good deal, ill trade them my p mag for their dpms and buy the other two.

Posted

But on a more serious note, there are alot of reviews hanging out there that the gen III Magpulls dont work well in the dpms GII, ruger 762, or Sig 716, so maybe magpul isn't making the genII's anymore, and the companies dont want their gen III because they dont feed properly.

Which wouldn't make too much sense if they offered dpms instead, which also didn't feed properly.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...