98Z5V

There's a guy here that doesn't use his much - he'd probably ship it out to Rob...

Just for clarification, the tapered pins have a standard dimension, and should be the same, pin to pin. The drilling/reaming of the holes, through the gas block and through the barrel - that's a one-shot deal, right there.

Same here...

Looks like 20% off MSRP, from what I saw - and they never sell at full MSRP. I lit them up the other night, so we'll even see if I receive what I ordered. If it comes in, I'll post the info. If it comes in fucked up, I'll post the info. We'll see how this goes, because the last round didn't go so well...

Just add some Tequila to that one, and we have a PARTY!!!

Looks like that's not a 0.18" group, right there. My point exactly. I'm seeing 8 holes in that target, myself, but what are the black stickers for? Those really widen the group out...

That stuff is set up with tapered reams or bits, for that gas block and that barrel, and those pins. One-time use with that combination of parts. They only work together...

HELL FUCKIN' YES, BROTHER!!!!

Rule #1. The Crazy Factor is present in this one... Rule #2. She's SMOKIN' HOT! I. AM. IN!!!!!

Look at the extractor first, brother...

They have to be modified...

Civilians need to have the right that every military member has, and every law enforcement member has. It's that simple. I'm not talking about the M72A2 LAW and M18A1 Claymore mine and shiit like that - I'm talking about standard, current firearms. If Military or LEO is allowed to have it, then it shouldn't be prohibited to civilians. I'm also talking about law-abiding citizens that can pass a NICS check, too. Fuk criminals. Anytime someone starts talking about "Civilians don't need...," then they're not in line with what the 2A is really about, why it was written, and what the thoughts of the drafters were thinking. The drafters of that were definitely talking about tyrannical government, because they were fighting against a tyrannical government at the time, and didn't want that to ever happen to the citizens again...

"... and I'm lookin' at YOU, ARFCOM GD..." TOO funny!!! lmfao!

I SWEAR I was coming in here to say that... LMFAO! He'd be the only guy in SF that you could buy a gun from - would have cornered the market!!! HAHA! This statement from the article is just plain nuts - not even the BATFE has the authority to do this, and the city police are damn sure not allowed to do it - NOT their jurisdiction, in the least... Not even legal for a city-police entity to enforce... Not in THIS country... The 1986 FOPA, as bad as it was in some areas, prohibited this, and that's a Federal Action that trumps the state, county, and city laws. The Act also forbade the U.S. Government agency from keeping a registry directly linking non-National Firearms Act firearms to their owners, the specific language of this law (Federal Law 18 U.S.C. 926 No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation. I don't understand why this wasn't challenged by that gun shop before, especially since they state that they had to provide similar information in the past, on a regular basis... The only reason for them to turn anything over to the local police would be from "cooperation," as they only have to do that for the BATFE, when specifically requested by the BATFE, in a current investigation. Unreal...

Damn, that thing is nice. With only 60 made, they are gonna be gone... QUICK! After that, the price on resale will go through the roof...

Opps, left out the Mk12 Mod 1. The "second gen" - or 3rd or 4th gen, if you know the rifle... Thank you, DogFightInk for the pics - you guys rock.

SPR: Mk12. Any variation THIS... however, is the Mk11. Completely different rifle, but derived from the Mk12. THIS... is the M110. Again, different... There is only one SPR, but of a few varients (Mod 0, Mod 1, Mod H).

Easy - answered you in the other thread you tried to take over.

Did the Leupold Mark AR 1-4 on my 16" 300BLK, and I love it. Perfect for it. You'll love it, wash. Find something made by Barnes, in the TSX or TTSX variety, and you'll have a pig and deer slayer, brother. Projo weight won't matter, with those things. EDIT - Shiit! It's a 1.5~4 scope... This one: https://www.leupold.com/hunting-shooting/scopes/mark-ar-riflescopes/mark-ar-mod-1-1-5-4x20mm/

GG, get out of this guy's thread with that, and start your own. OP, damn good looking rifle.

SPR - first, "Special Purpose Receiver." Later, it wasn't just an upper, it was a whole "Special Purpose Rifle." Way off the mark, for yours. Read and learn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mk_12_Special_Purpose_Rifle http://www.precisionreflex.com/Content.aspx?PAGE=Mark12+Mod+0+SPR http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_118/520524_Official_Mk12_Mod0__Mod1__ModH_Photo_and_Discussion_Thread__Part_II.html Why don't you hop in that thread on ARF, and ask them if you have an SPR?...

Yep, pull it, brother Lonny. It's committed...

^^^ That's "takin' one for the team," right there... lmao...

Ummm... that's not an SPR setup...

I think those 3 are the only ones...