Matt.Cross

Oh no, they didn't have a pre-order option. I bought mine through Optics Planet, but if you sign up for Magpul's newsletter you get an email when they begin shipping new products.

I got the email today that they're shipping out from Magpul, which means mine should be arriving soon.

They're shipping now! https://www.magpul.com/products/magpul-bipod-for-1913-picatinny-rail

How is that possible, there's at least two different primary lengths....

That's pretty much where I was going, but I don't know Jack....

Wow. That's incredible, and an exhausting read, but worth it. Crooked thieving douchebags....

What do you mean by "in the exact same place"? The top of the hole is in one place, and the bottom is in another. Where between those two locations is the "same place" a vertical hole should be? If you mean that the straight vertical buffer retainer would hypothetically terminate at the same location, that's not a good idea or practice in terms of manufacturing and good engineering/quality control.

That would place the tip of the retainer further towards the rear of the receiver, requiring a longer BCG tail to make contact with the buffer. It would also make the area at the top of the receiver extension threads weaker by virtue of less metal there.

Looking at the blue print, bottom row, 2nd from left part view. Look directly above and to the right of the rear receiver threads and you'll see the 6° specification for the buffer retainer hole offset.

Sorry brother, this is a party foul. You're not in any trouble, just understand that it is bad juju to do this in someone else's sale thread. Carry on.

* Must... Resist.... Temptation..... *

I completely believe it brother, that is outstanding! This is a newer favorite recipe for me but I think it's going to be a favorite recipe for a mighty long time. Between the relish and the smoked paprika, it's harder to beat than a sore dick.

Guys, all this has been resolved, we're moving forward with a better idea. As you were.

Alright, with all that cleared up, let's fix Gopher's gun!

This thread is about Gopher's gun and what it will take to get it to run, not about whether or not PSA belongs in the large AR market, and not about who owns PSA large ARs with no issues. If you aren't having issues relevant to this thread, posts concerning that fact aren't relevant, and will undoubtedly be treated as such. Glad to know your rifle is running right, but this thread isn't about that.

Here is the answer to that very question; if the torque wrench is at a 90° angle to the armorer's wrench, there is no effect, you'll get the torque that you set the wrench to get. If you use the torque wrench in line with the armorer's wrench, you'll get 1.75 times your torque wrench setting.

Lothar Walther barrel, that's the problem...

Well, this just became relevant...

Good luck with that, he has to rent a time machine to get that old dinosaur to take a battery charge.

2092.3gp

Tensioning works correctly... More than 90° cant either direction and holds tension throughout...

Thanks Doc, when the going gets tough, the tough switch to Cheerwine. After painting..... Pre-final mockup...

Indeed, more than 90° of it! Milling the radius the old-fashioned way... Before sanding... After sanding & before bead blasting... After bead blasting & before painting...

A quick mock up...