blue109 Posted June 20, 2015 Report Share Posted June 20, 2015 It's a indi animated movie. Kinda surreal but cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planeflyer21 Posted June 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 20, 2015 It's a indi animated movie. Kinda surreal but cool. Just watched it...hurt my eyes. But shampoo makes them feel better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue109 Posted June 20, 2015 Report Share Posted June 20, 2015 Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StainTrain Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 If the news is accurate, Roof's friends can expect some scrutiny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unforgiven Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 As usual thier were alot of red flags.FB posts and pictures and no one said a word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 (edited) If someone or one of his supposedly friends ,would have said something to LE about his desire to shoot people , maybe they could have Baker acted him & got a Psych. exam . Not sure what they call a LE or Dr's. forced admission to a Hospitals Psych. ward in other States , but here in Florida its called a Baker act admission . Its controversial , because it can have the possibility of abuse ,but it may have saved someone or maybe get the help this creep needed. Edited June 21, 2015 by survivalshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue109 Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 Then you start getting into "thought crime" territory. I know there is a big difference between someone saying "I'd love to...." and "I'm going to...." but it does open us to the possibility of pretty serious abuse as you said. Takes a lot of trust in the system to agree with that, and I'm lacking that trust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StainTrain Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 (edited) Then you start getting into "thought crime" territory. I know there is a big difference between someone saying "I'd love to...." and "I'm going to...." but it does open us to the possibility of pretty serious abuse as you said. Takes a lot of trust in the system to agree with that, and I'm lacking that trust. It already happens. It is a 72 hour evaluation. All states have the mechanism in one form or another. While I see the concern over thought crime and abuses, there is a distinction between thought crime and someone who is having a psychiatric episode, a severely altered state of reality or mental disturbance. As far as abuse by the state, that is why the 72 hour limitation is placed on the evaluation. Sometimes the involuntary evaluation is the only solution since the individual is expressing the desire to hurt themselves or someone else, but there is no crime that has been committed. It should be noted that hospitals and family members seek and obtain these involuntary evaluations at an exponentially higher rate than Law Enforcement. Edited June 21, 2015 by StainTrain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgecrusher Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 ^^^^ true, although lately I've filled out my share. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planeflyer21 Posted June 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 A bit of difference between "I'm going to shoot a bunch of black folks minding their own business," and "Our government officials not following the Constitution need to be tried for treason and hanged by the neck until dead," and "People should be afforded a means to work their way off welfare/government assistance and become a valued, contributing member of society." Sadly, the last one is most likely to get you labeled as a "right-wing extremist lone wolf terrorist" by TPTB these days. The middle one not so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue109 Posted June 21, 2015 Report Share Posted June 21, 2015 I don't like that attitude mister. Come on down and have a chat with my friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue109 Posted June 23, 2015 Report Share Posted June 23, 2015 Better add another layer of foil..http://right.is/politics/2015/06/charleston-shooter-is-actor-us-marine-crisis-actor-as-jade-helm-stipulates-video-29959.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasyEJL Posted June 23, 2015 Report Share Posted June 23, 2015 lord. Like I expect the timer on a cctv at a southern church to be correct. I'm sure every power flicker it resets and nobody bothers to fix it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planeflyer21 Posted June 23, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2015 US Marine aviator and actor? Palerider29...is dat you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepp Posted June 23, 2015 Report Share Posted June 23, 2015 lord. Like I expect the timer on a cctv at a southern church to be correct. I'm sure every power flicker it resets and nobody bothers to fix it Right?!? Look the sky is falling!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted June 23, 2015 Report Share Posted June 23, 2015 all that video successfully did ws show that a child actor went on to become a Marine, and was in aviation training at some point... That bull$hit couldn't even link the child actor to the fuckhead that shot up the church... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue109 Posted June 23, 2015 Report Share Posted June 23, 2015 I will say I'm not ruling out BS on his manifesto. Don't think that tard could spell his full name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
survivalshop Posted June 24, 2015 Report Share Posted June 24, 2015 all that video successfully did ws show that a child actor went on to become a Marine, and was in aviation training at some point... That bull$hit couldn't even link the child actor to the fuckhead that shot up the church... They sure were stuck on that actors accomplishments , I feel sorry for him , where ever he is , after that video, set him up good ! Maybe they want a hit on him <laughs> , because he was a bad actor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRA Posted July 1, 2015 Report Share Posted July 1, 2015 (edited) FWIW ... This received today from the Texas State Rifle Association regarding carrying weapons in church in Texas; "Handgun Licensees in Texas Churches Yes, We can carry in Church! In 1995 when CHL law passed, Penal Code 46.035, Unlawful Carrying of Handgun By License Holder, prohibited license holders from carrying in church. ( B)(4) on the premises of a church, synagogue, or other established place of religious worship. In 1997, the Legislature added line (i) to PC 46.035 which reversed the prohibition on churches and certain other locations such as "governmental meetings". Subsection (i) reads: (i)Subsections ( B)(4), ( B)(5), ( B)(6) and © do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06. This allowed churches to be treated as they are, as private property. A church has been able to post PC 30.06 since 1997 . Effective notice could also mean that a person in authority representing the church asked the licensee to leave. The net result is Texans have had access to this important form of personal protection in church for over a decade. The last attempt to prohibit licensees from carrying in church was during the 1999 Legislative session. Pastor Willard Rother, a Lutheran minister, testified against the bill saying the peace of God was not disturbed by law-abiding citizens exercising their right to personal protection. He also told the committee that he did not need help from the State of Texas with managing his church or his congregation. The measure to reinstate the prohibition never received a committee vote and that was that. Most Texas licensees enjoy the right to carry including the opportunity to carry at church if they chose. Again, this has been possible for over a decade." Again ... this is from an e-mail I received this date from the Texas State Rifle Association. Edited July 1, 2015 by GRA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
392heminut Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 My pastor requests that I carry when I'm in church! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtallen83 Posted July 3, 2015 Report Share Posted July 3, 2015 They carry where my Mother and Wife go to church, from what I hear it isn't that unusual these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted December 16, 2016 Report Share Posted December 16, 2016 CONVICTED. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/12/15/dylann-roof-convicted-in-charleston-church-massacre.html Dylann Roof convicted in Charleston church massacre A jury in South Carolina Thursday convicted Dylann Roof in the shootings that killed nine black church members during a Bible study in Charleston last year, a verdict that could lead to a death sentence for the self-avowed white supremacist. The jury of nine white people and three black people deliberated less than two hours before returning a verdict, finding him guilty on all counts against him. Roof, 22, faced 33 federal charges, including hate crimes and obstruction of the practice of religion. Roof just stared ahead as the verdict was read, much as he has throughout the trial. Victims's relatives held hands and squeezed one another's arms. One woman nodded her head every time the clerk said "guilty." The same jury is set to return Jan. 3 to consider whether Roof should be sentenced to die for the June 2015 attack at Emanuel AME Church. He is slated to face another death penalty trial in state court early next year. Minutes after the verdict was read, Roof told U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel he wanted to represent himself during the penalty phase. He said at the start of the trial that he wanted attorneys in the guilt phase, but not in the penalty phase. His lawyers said in a court filing they feared he wanted to avoid embarrassing testimony that the defense might have presented to try to get a jury to spare his life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
planeflyer21 Posted December 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2016 No surprise here. The real moral of the story is this: avoid the odd males with Dorothy Hamill hairdos and, if you find yourself in their presence, be prepared to venilate them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
392heminut Posted December 17, 2016 Report Share Posted December 17, 2016 I hope that puke gets the death penalty! POS bastrd! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98Z5V Posted January 10, 2017 Report Share Posted January 10, 2017 The little fukstick just got the death penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.